Cherry Yuusha to "Sei" Naru Tsurugi - Vol. 2 Ch. 11 - Motherhood

[MangaDex]

 

[fury130]

chad mc come for boob stay for boob
save the world just minor priority

 

[RakshaJaeger]

It should have been me I just want one, how can he have 3 of them for free (the loli doesn’t count, no boobs no need)

 

[PechWild]

A nice, heartwarming chapter, but with the impelling plague and the focus on the squad leader...

Soon.

 

[ciera]

Thanks for the chapter

 

[WonderingSFaiz]

Alright buddy, that's the one, you must unsheathe Excalibur

 

[Miserys_End]

It should have been me I just want one, how can he have 3 of them for free (the loli doesn’t count, no boobs no need)

Every breast is sacred, every sized breast is good. Not saying you can't have a preference, only that you shouldn't overly discriminate. Otherwise you open yourself up to commentary on that rather disappointing lack of bulk in your pants.

 

[lesseffective]

Turns out Rosemary was even more perverted!!

 

[AgniZet]

 

[Kushikime]

Thanks for the chapter

 

[Mmat97]

Just harem antics and possible foreshadowin of Rosemary's past coming back

 

[Rowdy91]

No, no. Not bold enough, I say!

 

[Immortal44]

Broo naahhhh
Why is there no harem tag nooooooooooooo

 

[JaceG13]

I've folded my brothers... Rosemary ftw!

 

[ItsThatBriGuy]

Isekai Mato Seihei?

 

[Giga]

Thanks for the chapter, BAS.

---

Every breast is sacred, every sized breast is good. Not saying you can't have a preference, only that you shouldn't overly discriminate. Otherwise you open yourself up to commentary on that rather disappointing lack of bulk in your pants.

No, that's not true. The people--women and the people controlling those women--that brainwashed millions of men into spouting that mantra know well that it's not, themselves: one can tell due to the fact that when someone has a problem with small or medium-sized breasts, there's always someone saying something like what you did; when someone has a problem with large breasts, no one has anything similar to say--no one tries to beat that person with such a line.

Simply put, there's no mantra defending large breasts that carries such an arbitrary moral imperative--one only exists for the undeveloped female chest. This suits women because they claim believe everyone is beautiful (they don't actually believe it, and they will show you fast--especially with their peers, should they become hostile to one) and because they often wax envious of their large-breasted peers; this suits pedophiles because they like the "DFC" of "lolis"; and this suits people with one foot in the closet, because they like women who bear less exclusively and inherently feminine physical development.

That said, why tell him that he can have a preference then take a veiled shot at him right after? No confidence in the truth of what you're saying?

---

Fun fact: an epidemic is the fast spread of an infectious disease, while a pandemic is an epidemic with explosive characteristics--spreading rapidly, but also across geographic boundaries. What the demon girls threatened was the former, since it's aimed specifically at that country.

 

[Miserys_End]

No, that's not true.

Think thats a matter of opinion, rather then fact.

The people--women and the people controlling those women--that brainwashed millions of men into spouting that mantra know well that it's not, themselves: one can tell due to the fact that when someone has a problem with small or medium-sized breasts, there's always someone saying something like what you did; when someone has a problem with large breasts, no one has anything similar to say--no one tries to beat that person with such a line.

Simply put, there's no mantra defending large breasts that carries such an arbitrary moral imperative--one only exists for the undeveloped female chest. This suits women because they claim believe everyone is beautiful (they don't actually believe it, and they will show you fast--especially with their peers, should they become hostile to one) and because they often wax envious of their large-breasted peers; this suits pedophiles because they like the "DFC" of "lolis"; and this suits people with one foot in the closet, because they like women who bear less exclusively and inherently feminine physical development.

Im nearly 50 now and had the dubious honor of dating many women. During these relationships I've had a fair few conversations relating to how my partners viewed their bodies and what their preferences would be if they could change them.

Some wanted to lessen their burden, while others desired more. But the majority where happy with what they had. Opinions may differ from person to person, but I can say without a doubt I'm my mind I enjoyed each and every one.

That's not to say there isn't a twisted perception and double standard in our society when it comes to someone else's body. But the same is true for many aspects of our lives.

You may ascribe to these harmful expectations, but me personally, I've always chosen to praise and enjoy what's before me, rather then whine about what if's and could be's.

That said, why tell him that he can have a preference then take a veiled shot at him right after? No confidence in the truth of what you're saying.

You are free to have preference, but insulting another person's features opens you up to the same scrutiny.

 

[Giga]

Think thats a matter of opinion, rather then fact.

If that's so, then neither sanctity nor the concept of "good" exist, because everything is sacred, and everything is good. Everything is effectively the same in quality because there is no standard by which something can be distinguished as good or bad. The idea that beauty is purely subjective was massively popularized in recent years because of the effeminacy of today's First World: everyone has to be included, no one can be left out; everyone has to feel like a winner, no one can be made to feel inferior--everyone gets a participation prize.

But, like I said, such subjective evaluation only applies to some things--and that's by design.

Im nearly 50 now and had the dubious honor of dating many women. During these relationships I've had a fair few conversations relating to how my partners viewed their bodies and what their preferences would be if they could change them.

Some wanted to lessen their burden, while others desired more. But the majority where happy with what they had. Opinions may differ from person to person, but I can say without a doubt I'm my mind I enjoyed each and every one.

That's not to say there isn't a twisted perception and double standard in our society when it comes to someone else's body. But the same is true for many aspects of our lives.

You may ascribe to these harmful expectations, but me personally, I've always chosen to praise and enjoy what's before me, rather then whine about what if's and could be's.

Your experiences are as they are, but they don't change reality. If you would avoid focusing on negativity by conjuring something good from a heap of bad (or even just mediocrities), that's one way to deal with a bad hand--I understand that. In this context, however, you're still just accepting bad things because you've relinquished your choice to do otherwise.

A spade will always be a spade, even if you wanted a heart instead and told yourself that your spade's just as good in the end. You'll have to forgive my repurposing of the saying.

You are free to have preference, but insulting another person's features opens you up to the same scrutiny.

Scrutiny, yes--but an attack is a different story. It does, when you think about it: any expression opens you up to an attack, the way it should be--as opposed to how things would be in a padded-wall world filled with blunted corners and rounded edges (which is what the First World has become). Doesn't change the fact that an attack does nothing to disprove the other person--and it's a tactic regularly employed to impose a chilling effect on those with "problematic" perspectives, one regularly used by exactly the kind who have a problem with busty women in entertainment but not the "medium 'premium'" or pedobait.

That said, the person you quoted didn't insult anyone, nor was his comment directed at anyone (aside from his indirect references to the characters in the story). It is absurd to get upset on someone else's behalf--even worse when the person is not upset, and much worse if the "person" is imagined...or did you take what he said personally?

 

[KuroViLolitannia]

Reading manga about big tiddies and lolis being groped.

Comments are people yapping like they are missionary from 1800s discussing about religion.

Never change weebs, never change.

 

[McFatty]

She has milf energy