Jokes aside, I don't know if the person who wrote that also did as you said he did, but multiple articles mentioned how excess death is through the roof, while covid is down. That was just the first one that popped up so I shared it.
But I have been a bit mean, so let me help you out. Start by looking at people who are critical, and see if they have something to say that might sound reasonable to you. One of such people is Dr Campbell, a renowned scientist who was first for the covid treatment, but has since retracted his support for it due to the many cases of people suffering severe side effects. You can easily read about him online, and here are just the very first few articles I was able to find about his findings and many others:
"Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning (8th November)"
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
"Measurement of multiple protein biomarkers, which generates a score predicting the 5 year risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome Score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers, IL-16, (a proinflammatory cytokine)"
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10857846/
"Soluble Fas, (an inducer of apoptosis)"
https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/ajpheart.00777.2002
"FasL is the ligand adenoviral overexpression of FasL Hepatocyte Growth Factor (serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue)"
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/hepatocyte-growth-factor
"Among other markers Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score Decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients. This report summarizes those results A total of 566 patients, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac. We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination. Dr. Stephen R Gundry Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test"
Aside from those scientific studies, here is a summary by an article talking about him.
https://publichealthpolicyjournal.c...hs-in-countries-with-high-mrna-vaccine-rates/
And here is an old post from 3 years ago, when the first signs of side effects started to pop off:
You are welcome

Again, this was easily found if you just looked past the mainstream sources. Now if you don't mind, I'll go back to posting about elves