Recent content by MrMeh

You missed my point. The slander is in saying that a person is projecting their own personal issues on the matter rather than just being a surface level psychologist/know it all etc. We all know someone who reads a book and then acts authoritatively on the subject. Thus the character...

The label of projection in common discourse has become such a petty and a uncharitable weapon. Whether slander or an accurate statement, there's seemingly is no rebuttable that's able to counter such rhetoric. All that matters is the crowd's alignment as to who's analysis reigns "true". Though...

Oooouugh Arduino Nano utilised! 😭 😭 😭

:bleh:

At this point I'm going to be disappointed if this doesn't end in some kind of boogaloo and just simmers out.

Knowing you I don't want to look it up. :aquadrink: Description only pls.

Pop the pirate was a great game.

Look it's not complicated. Stop labelling me, I don't like it on principle as it's slander.

I gave you an out to leave things amicably, you didn't need to be snarky.

I'm trying to show you that rhetoric is bad manners. You end up insulting someone's character without providing a reason why, which makes that person feel cheated. But I'm not going to keep this going, have a nice day.

It's not worth it if you're only looking for sex and affection. If you're obsessed with spreading your genes, getting a particular gender child (Henry the 8th) or have a personal race-identity/political obsession causing it (Boris Johnson) then there's a vile logic to it.

You're very good at question avoidance thing, you should be a town councillor. I honestly wanted to hear your explanation, but no worries.

Couvade syndrome?

There very much is and I'd like to know why you thought such was the case?