Isekai Drug ~Yakugaku Chishiki de Monster Musume-tachi wo Toriko ni shite Nariagaru~ - Vol. 2 Ch. 9

[MangaDex]

 

[spicykestrel]

teleports behind you - omae wa mou shindeiru

 

[ScryedParadox]

Oh wow, what a shock, the Dragon Girl is a Loli. Who could have foreseen this? What a tweest.
Now the question is. Is her age FBI open up. Legal or Baba? Or some fantasy version of technically FBI Open up but sir she's legal by her tribe's standards and arguably she's even a baba?

Who knows.... Oh and also woman in white, something something plot, but let's not be distracted from the real important part being that we're seeing more harem members popping up around the yandere menhera schoolgirl and the recipient of the harem, the MC himself. Meaning we're closer to another night time battle scene.

 

[Junomano]

erm, why are chapters in MD going like : available in 1-2hrs?
i hop in comment section and seems like it's a me problem since others looks like they have read the new chapters

 

[monkey123]

The dragon princess needs lots of correction! 💢💢💢😭😭😭

 

[Shadowcrazy4]

The dragon princess needs lots of correction! 💢💢💢😭😭😭

😂
Well I wonder who will succumb to some weird medicine first? Or will the princess just fall on her own? Thank you for the chapter

 

[CrimsonSix]

The plot is growing thicker.

 

[kunyka]

Why again a half-bred instead of a dragon who can turn into a dragon?!

 

[lebbylan]

Based from my knowledge, I know dragon likes car.
So give this dragon loli a car to convince her, maybe it'll become the next dragon society's drug too

 

[cryum]

erm, why are chapters in MD going like : available in 1-2hrs?
i hop in comment section and seems like it's a me problem since others looks like they have read the new chapters

That's an issue with your computer's clock

 

[Junomano]

That's an issue with your computer's clock

you are right, my pc had problems during the week and i finally got it fixed today and the clock was a mess, it's on time now

 

[phil777]

Oh wow, what a shock, the Dragon Girl is a Loli. Who could have foreseen this? What a tweest.
Now the question is. Is her age FBI open up. Legal or Baba? Or some fantasy version of technically FBI Open up but sir she's legal by her tribe's standards and arguably she's even a baba?

You think FBI is still looking for pedophiles when they have one as their head of state and among his administration?

 

[ScryedParadox]

You think FBI is still looking for pedophiles when they have one as their head of state and among his administration?

Since I'm already ignoring one of the old rules of the internet of "Lurk More" since I'm posting in here for my own fun.

I might as well also ignore another old rule of the internet of "Don't feed the troll" by asking, well potentially asking a few general questions and also making a few statements, after all this is a public forum and part of the reply is not specifically for you, but for anyone curious enough to look at this. As for whether or not you are or aren't a troll or think you are or aren't one is irrelevant. The result is the same in an online space with what you're adding in here which isn't all that subtle.

Spoiler: This is a large wall of text, feel free to ignore it, in fact feel free to ignore this entire post

My apologies in advance, I am simply going to be writing my thoughts as they come and go, so it might end up flowing weirdly or flowing about here and there. I do not feel the need to spend an extra amount of time cleaning this up. Brevity of course is a desirable thing, but brevity requires a lot of effort to rework everything you wish to say in as short a period of time as you need to, and therefore takes more time to write out than a wall of text you can just dump out. And I don't really feel this deserves much more effort than what comes and goes.

Ideally, the best solution really is to just ignore people like you who, without any reason whatsoever, decides to improperly slip into a hobby focused forum a sudden partisan political jab to covertly push a political leaning into a space. While it can be argued whether that stance is or isn't generally agreed upon, it still sets up the initial Bait of introducing partisan political discussion.

I specify partisan politics, because it is ultimately team sports partisan politics. Discussion of politics such as geopolitics within the context of a story and how we can relate it to real world historical events with clearly documented results and how a story could develop based on our knowledge of socioeconomics as sporatic as it may be for a bunch of geeks and nerds online anonymously discussing it with one another is one thing.

But introducing something that one party could be considered hostile is another thing.

You do not know who is consuming a content. They could be from your country, I specify that because I'm not in the US. They could be of your political leaning, albeit a moderate. They could be of your opposing party and may even agree with some of your claims of corruption that are so vague that really it is impossible to pinpoint exactly who you are discussing but you are clearly making a jab that is supposed to insinuate that this is obviously clear cut knowledge and an opinion that everyone should be sharing.

Or they could be from one of the many hundreds of other countries outside of yours who do not really give a damn about your partisan politics.

And why is it necessary to point this out. Because the whole FBI open up thing is a general meme, not really something people expect to suddenly veer into Specifically US partisan political jabs.

I imagine you are thinking that you are being very light hearted and jokeful and whatnot, or maybe you truly are just trolling and baiting for political tensions rising in an unrelated corner of the internet. But I would advise to avoid it. It ruins the experience for everyone involved, even those who are in your own party, because you unnecessarily begin introducing something irrelevant to the focus which is the story itself.

While it might be one thing to be an annoying person rambling about something in the story or getting something in the story wrong, or crashing out about your strong feelings about the story or the author or the artist, because of how well or bad they make their stories, or how badly they draw a character or how an artist is really bad at drawing appealing characters. It's another to introduce unrelated elements.

And if you wanted me to answer your question seriously. I can.

I believe all parties in politics are generally corrupt. Not that all members are corrupt, but that it is simply the nature of power when provided to those who are able to lead within a system that can be utilized to obfuscate cause, effect and responsibility. It's something you learn when working any job really, whether in the private sector or the public sector and whenever dealing with any form of bureaucracy. There is also leeway for it to reveal itself through either incompetence or active malice. And even those who speak and behave righteously in public may in fact be the most corrupt of people on the back end, and if they have enough power they are able to create a lot of additional layers of obfuscation and protection from themselves.

Either from the general culture of people who are too busy with their personal lives to devote enough time, energy and resources to look into the matter themselves.

The nature that a lot of us just simply rely on general fallacies for our everyday lives because we deal with too much to begin with, such as the fallacy of authority or of the masses, where we do not actually spend enough time to look into sources ourselves to properly fully cement into certainty what knowledge we have. But ultimately we still move forward with the general foundation of what we know, though ultimately we should also wisely choose to acknowledge that if what we know is in the wrong, to have enough flexibility to alter our perception and our base of knowledge to adjust to that.

In any case, this rambling has been a bit all over the place. But it's basically just a general query of whether or not you are actually baiting a space to try and get some partisan heat going, for your own amusement. Or if you are truly too brain rotten that you cannot help but feel that partisan political jabs are an acceptable form of entertainment to be had in a space that did not actually intend to have any partisan political discussion or elements anywhere and therefore lack some self control or awareness.

In any case. I do not actually believe you will be reading this. But for those that do, I hope you've had some entertainment reading this. I imagine that some people may have immediately also jumped the gun and made assumptions on my political leaning solely because I have misgivings about people inserting US partisan political based jabs, which if you are doing that, you may want to consider if you've perhaps let yourself be a bit too brain rotted with social media as well. Though admittedly, that has become the norm when reading people's actions online and it has become a damned shame that even just being a moderate liberal from the 90s has nowadays become the equivalent of being a political extremist, which includes the simple moderate request of. Don't bring up partisan politics.

Also, your joke isn't something that's as universal as you think it is. I think you just came out of a much smaller bubble than you expected and entered a slightly larger bubble and may not realize that your humor may have been shaped of a much smaller echo chamber. Because I honestly have no clue who exactly you are suggesting. And I say that as someone who has been looking a lot into the US partisan politics for my own entertainment as an outsider looking at the fiasco that has been your country for the past dozens of years.

In any case. I guess thank you for this thought exercise and letting my mind wander for a few dozen minutes to write this up without much second thought. If I said something stupid, eh. Sure. I mean I'm not taking the time to re-read this, double check myself or really do anything outside of just rambling what comes to mind.

But more importantly...

Will the Dragon Loli get corrected or not? I mean, the MC is basically going to go around conquering all the beast girls. After all we already confirmed she's mischievous based on what her father said. So clearly she needs some Uoooooooooh

That is truly the more pressing and important matter at hand.

 

[Akira056894]

I can't wait to see the woman got white in her

 

[Bedlam123]

Dragon loli x what appears to be a fox milf. Guess we're ticking alot of tropes

 

[KuroViLolitannia]

Prof is literally MC from Asanagi's doujin / manga. No way the woman will win.

 

[Kingdex88]

yandere schoolgirl is getting more yandere.

 

[kunyka]

Dragon loli x what appears to be a fox milf. Guess we're ticking alot of tropes

SHE IS NOT A DRAGON

 

[HelioCesar]

didn't know dragon-folk had bbl

 

[Lamasis]

Since I'm already ignoring one of the old rules of the internet of "Lurk More" since I'm posting in here for my own fun.

I might as well also ignore another old rule of the internet of "Don't feed the troll" by asking, well potentially asking a few general questions and also making a few statements, after all this is a public forum and part of the reply is not specifically for you, but for anyone curious enough to look at this. As for whether or not you are or aren't a troll or think you are or aren't one is irrelevant. The result is the same in an online space with what you're adding in here which isn't all that subtle.

Spoiler: This is a large wall of text, feel free to ignore it, in fact feel free to ignore this entire post

My apologies in advance, I am simply going to be writing my thoughts as they come and go, so it might end up flowing weirdly or flowing about here and there. I do not feel the need to spend an extra amount of time cleaning this up. Brevity of course is a desirable thing, but brevity requires a lot of effort to rework everything you wish to say in as short a period of time as you need to, and therefore takes more time to write out than a wall of text you can just dump out. And I don't really feel this deserves much more effort than what comes and goes.

Ideally, the best solution really is to just ignore people like you who, without any reason whatsoever, decides to improperly slip into a hobby focused forum a sudden partisan political jab to covertly push a political leaning into a space. While it can be argued whether that stance is or isn't generally agreed upon, it still sets up the initial Bait of introducing partisan political discussion.

I specify partisan politics, because it is ultimately team sports partisan politics. Discussion of politics such as geopolitics within the context of a story and how we can relate it to real world historical events with clearly documented results and how a story could develop based on our knowledge of socioeconomics as sporatic as it may be for a bunch of geeks and nerds online anonymously discussing it with one another is one thing.

But introducing something that one party could be considered hostile is another thing.

You do not know who is consuming a content. They could be from your country, I specify that because I'm not in the US. They could be of your political leaning, albeit a moderate. They could be of your opposing party and may even agree with some of your claims of corruption that are so vague that really it is impossible to pinpoint exactly who you are discussing but you are clearly making a jab that is supposed to insinuate that this is obviously clear cut knowledge and an opinion that everyone should be sharing.

Or they could be from one of the many hundreds of other countries outside of yours who do not really give a damn about your partisan politics.

And why is it necessary to point this out. Because the whole FBI open up thing is a general meme, not really something people expect to suddenly veer into Specifically US partisan political jabs.

I imagine you are thinking that you are being very light hearted and jokeful and whatnot, or maybe you truly are just trolling and baiting for political tensions rising in an unrelated corner of the internet. But I would advise to avoid it. It ruins the experience for everyone involved, even those who are in your own party, because you unnecessarily begin introducing something irrelevant to the focus which is the story itself.

While it might be one thing to be an annoying person rambling about something in the story or getting something in the story wrong, or crashing out about your strong feelings about the story or the author or the artist, because of how well or bad they make their stories, or how badly they draw a character or how an artist is really bad at drawing appealing characters. It's another to introduce unrelated elements.

And if you wanted me to answer your question seriously. I can.

I believe all parties in politics are generally corrupt. Not that all members are corrupt, but that it is simply the nature of power when provided to those who are able to lead within a system that can be utilized to obfuscate cause, effect and responsibility. It's something you learn when working any job really, whether in the private sector or the public sector and whenever dealing with any form of bureaucracy. There is also leeway for it to reveal itself through either incompetence or active malice. And even those who speak and behave righteously in public may in fact be the most corrupt of people on the back end, and if they have enough power they are able to create a lot of additional layers of obfuscation and protection from themselves.

Either from the general culture of people who are too busy with their personal lives to devote enough time, energy and resources to look into the matter themselves.

The nature that a lot of us just simply rely on general fallacies for our everyday lives because we deal with too much to begin with, such as the fallacy of authority or of the masses, where we do not actually spend enough time to look into sources ourselves to properly fully cement into certainty what knowledge we have. But ultimately we still move forward with the general foundation of what we know, though ultimately we should also wisely choose to acknowledge that if what we know is in the wrong, to have enough flexibility to alter our perception and our base of knowledge to adjust to that.

In any case, this rambling has been a bit all over the place. But it's basically just a general query of whether or not you are actually baiting a space to try and get some partisan heat going, for your own amusement. Or if you are truly too brain rotten that you cannot help but feel that partisan political jabs are an acceptable form of entertainment to be had in a space that did not actually intend to have any partisan political discussion or elements anywhere and therefore lack some self control or awareness.

In any case. I do not actually believe you will be reading this. But for those that do, I hope you've had some entertainment reading this. I imagine that some people may have immediately also jumped the gun and made assumptions on my political leaning solely because I have misgivings about people inserting US partisan political based jabs, which if you are doing that, you may want to consider if you've perhaps let yourself be a bit too brain rotted with social media as well. Though admittedly, that has become the norm when reading people's actions online and it has become a damned shame that even just being a moderate liberal from the 90s has nowadays become the equivalent of being a political extremist, which includes the simple moderate request of. Don't bring up partisan politics.

Also, your joke isn't something that's as universal as you think it is. I think you just came out of a much smaller bubble than you expected and entered a slightly larger bubble and may not realize that your humor may have been shaped of a much smaller echo chamber. Because I honestly have no clue who exactly you are suggesting. And I say that as someone who has been looking a lot into the US partisan politics for my own entertainment as an outsider looking at the fiasco that has been your country for the past dozens of years.

In any case. I guess thank you for this thought exercise and letting my mind wander for a few dozen minutes to write this up without much second thought. If I said something stupid, eh. Sure. I mean I'm not taking the time to re-read this, double check myself or really do anything outside of just rambling what comes to mind.

But more importantly...

Will the Dragon Loli get corrected or not? I mean, the MC is basically going to go around conquering all the beast girls. After all we already confirmed she's mischievous based on what her father said. So clearly she needs some Uoooooooooh

That is truly the more pressing and important matter at hand.

Why do you think that he is a troll?