I don't get it, he even had once when the lie was confessed to without him trying to have it so. Why wasn't he making sure to record any and all abuse, and accidentally catch that on recording? Or even proactively get one of them to confess while he's recording specifically for that purpose?
Besides that though, what makes even less sense is people treating him as if whatever story they heard is true, without having been given any proof.
Like, it is one thing if they had bruised and lacerated her to forge proof. But here he is somehow labeled as abusive without there ever even have been some wound (and even less signs of emotional abuse before the whole "scandal")? And even if there had, wouldn't the normal reaction to at least let him give his 5 cents first, to see if he had any claims otherwise?
The stalker charges makes even less sense, as it somehow went from "they are in a relationship" to the very next day "he's been stalking her. but there is no proof and somehow only been one day since they broke up that he could have been stalking during"