Search results

@usagiaddict That's not a new rule, it's been there for months. We're not planning on changing its interpretation compared to thus far.

They're not additional, they do apply to general comments. If you start banging on about the Muslims unprompted in a random chapter thread, you can expect getting moderated by having your post hidden or deleted. The same logic is now being applied to the chapters themselves, when that wasn't the...

Nobody is going to get banned, and if this change were because of Rapeman specifically, we would've done it a long time ago

@Pauan I wasn't strawmanning. You said you're aware of our position and perspective, so I replied as such. "Now there are things you can say in the comments that you cannot say in credit pages" is not exactly true. Creating an equal standard for credits pages and comments was exactly what I...

I'm sorry, but we have a website to run here, and we'd prefer it not be run to the ground and for people not to feel entitled to make our work miserable while we're trying to balance both a community that wants to keep uploading here as well as a community that wants to keep coming here to read...

Yeah what I was trying to say is that we haven't removed a single JB chapter that they didn't explicitly want us to remove, and if they for whatever reason wanted their chapters up here again, they could. They haven't gotten removed, they've removed their own stuff. Rapeman's existing chapters...

You did say /s but, just in case, I don't believe JB has gotten removed from anywhere

Frankly, we could have simply applied the "don't make the staff's job harder" rule here, but this makes it more explicit. There comes a point where the amount of reports, 3rd party smearing, decision-making, internal arguments and so on that we have to go through in the staff every time there's...

Even if a few pieces had been salvageable, I feel like Fuyuki is the kind of person who would feel even more guilty if she gave handmade stuff to only a few people but had gotten store-bought stuff for the rest

@Tikibo Oh sorry, I'm tired and misread

@Tikibo MangaStream never left MangaDex because their chapters were never posted here in the first place.

Yeah that's just going to be the standard APi

I'm pretty confused here. The manga and chapter comment threads are just that, normal forums threads. If you want a "live feed" of them, I suppose your best bet is their subforums. https://mangadex.org/forum/11 https://mangadex.org/forum/12

I've half-noticed complaints like this a few times but I ignored them because I knew that doesn't actually happen. However, I use double page, and I just remembered that I did change the history behaviour for long strip specifically so that it doesn't create history items for scrolling through...

https://mangadex.org/chapter/449569/1 Our system for this has not changed.

Seemed obviously enough a bot that I banned it

We don't have a hard guideline for it because there's obviously no simple way to define it, but more importantly it hasn't really come up much in the discussions amongst the staff in the almost two years we've been up. It's just not a real issue. I'm not a moderator so it's not my job to care...

Since some people seem to be confused about this for whatever reason: Nothing that Plyk said just now was a personal opinion but MangaDex's actual stance as far as our tag definitions go.

This is something I've been considering, so we'll see. Not a vital feature and those come first, so I'm marking this as a soft planned for now.

@PUNCTURE The "joke or troll releases" rule applies to chapters that are clearly intentionally inaccurate, awful, or otherwise overall so low quality that it's indistinguishable from trolling. It does not apply to releases that insert an occasional joke of their own, in much the same way...