Search results

Then why did he save Athena in Chapter 2?. Before they know the full repercussion of losing Est. It's not about whether he's a good person or not. What he feels and his goals. Daru did actions that are both diametrically opposing to each other. (You justify one. You contradict the other) Does...

So in turn. Dale is willingly to let: Athena feel the sorrow of seeing/ having her childhood friend die. (Ch.1) But not willing to let her get physically hurt or die for her failure. (Ch.2) I don't get it. Is he ungrateful or grateful?

He's precise part in fight is: Deliberately letting the backline get hurt? If he's there, JUST to observe. He wouldn't have helped at all. From protecting Athena (in the first battle without Est) and taming Frey. Athena not being able to get back on track herself and Daru helping is going...

That's why he chose to hide to power instead of protecting Est. and also almost letting Athena lose a friend and suffering from it. Only through luck that Est survive. Not stopping Athena from making choices that backfire or make her suffer. It doesn't matter how he got to making that...

Sounds like more failure and uselessness of Athena then. Finding a way to still be effective while having Athena or Daru to defend Est is literally Athena's Job So. Which make Dale's goal of seeing Athena being a better adventurer. stupid and questionable.

Honestly. This sounds like Athena, The leader. Is the useless/ detrimental member of the group. Also sounds like. Est is one being held back here already. Instead of supporting/ boosting the group to greater heights he instead turns into necessity to keep the group to just function normally...

Can you blame me?. All you literally do is "Point at things and call them stupid". I'm just trying to cover all my bases in response to whatever your criticism is. Because no matter what it is, I know it's gonna to be stupid. btw. This is just literally BASIC stuff in writing. You don't even...

Is it. "A Trait of a character in a stories must be homogenous and Uncomplex/ Simple. ie. A Yandere in this story must act exactly the act the same any as Yandere in other stories regardless of other story beats" or "Characters must take the optimal option/ choice even if that takes away the...

So a Character not being able to resolve their Fatal Flaw immediately and completely after realizing they have that flaw is stupid? ok.... Good luck finding stories that has characters with no personal conflict or growth.

Your incompetence in understanding of a Near-Basic trope astounds me.

Did you actually read the story? Dude literally asked the little sister to kill him if he brings harm to the girl. Dude was fully aware that his behavior is abnormal. The trope in play is "Reluctant Psycho". A LOT of stories wouldn't have happened if good mental health is available.

The Smartest option he can do. is cutting himself off from her. If he can do that. He wouldn't be a Yandere in the first place.

Have you read the story?. Dude was self-aware that he was a Yandere. He firmly believed a direct approach from him (a yandere) wouldn't end well at all.

And Possessive. Don't forget that part.

Nobody was betrayed (More specifically, Unless the Sister and Brother are in a relationship they can't betray each other in that way. Even if one of em' has the hots for each other) Nobody was taken Besides that ain't your logic "lil bro doesn't need to have the hots for his sister to be cucked"

That logic makes literally everyone including you. a cuck

Hope we get to the "even worse" part. Sooner rather than later. (Then again. It's still setting up her as Yandere if anything) And actually is "worse" than dealing with an actual Yandere.

Why are saying "Forcing a choice" like it's not a bad thing?

How is this a healthy human relationship?

Sexual Compatibility also includes "amount". (if not: rip asexuals to low sex-drive havers) Actual deal breaker is being incompatible and/or unhappy arrangement. Simple as that.