Search results

It's "separate", from Latin "separatio".

I love the lab – because it's all still magic, you know? Chemistry... It is magic. It still is.

Why is the fourteenth chapter under the "no volume" section, although the previous one be under the "Volume 2" section? Should it not be under the "Volume 2" or "Volume 3" section?

On page 15 the tag question should be "am I not?".

I read the inscription on the last page, and it was unexpected. mr. translator.

У вас ошибочка: ваша 282-я глава по содержанию дублирует 281-ю.

I noticed an error on page 2: "Aren't I a genius?" should obviously be "Am I not a genius?".

It's called "aura", bruh.

I prefer Bismarck and Sovetskij Soûz.

Imitating the archaic speech style is not equal to simply using arbitrary archaic words with no system nor logic. Let us take "What art those eyes for?" as an example: "art" is not an archaic form of "are" at all, it is the second person singular present tense conjugated form of "be", i. e...

"If this were animated..." – ye, kind sir, forgot to use the past subjunctive mood, which is required for type 2 conditional sentences.

There's a typo on page 4: "She have given birth..." should be "has" (or "hath", which would be even better).

Mimi's interlocutrix' phrase containeth an orthographical mistake: the verb should be "are" because the logical subject is "consequences" (third person plural).

"He is starting..." – ye missed the verb in this Present Continuous construction. "...his "fitting in" is..." – it's obviously a place for possessive with gerund. I consider you my friend in the battle for English grammar and insist that ye make no such glaring mistakes that undermine our efforts.

Yes, and I want to add that Kanaria's phrase on the fifth page clearly lacketh the preposition "from" and should read as "...Miku-san, I understand how empty ye mote feel from not being able to meet Sou-sama...". P. S. "ye" is the archaic nominative case form of "you", thus is technically...

I noticed some typos: 1) on page 14: "As excepted of the great Yuuki Rio.." (obviously, it should be "expected" while the two dots at the end should be three dots to make a proper ellipsis). 2) on page 45: "sheriously" instead of "seriously".

I fully agree and would like to add that "dozen" is not even a native English word, it's a loanword from French.

Except that there's a comma in a lower bubble on page 9 which isn't present on page 10. A similar situation is also with pages 14 and 15. And with pages 17 and 18.

I concur with Geako in this instance, and "toward" is just "the American way" of saying "towards". Otherwise I would have to find fault with your writing "color" because the true and only way of spelling it is "colour" (/s).

I noticed a typo on page 11: "...this incident won't effect..." – the verb should be "affect".