533801

[MangaDex]

 

[Azsy]

feelsbadman a repeat of an already released chapter

 

[Sindead28]

@azsy at better quality

 

[exogriz]

Since it's only a repeat of a better quality, it should be name version 2 instead of part 2 so as not to mislead people.

 

[babontil]

@exogriz

Its part 2 of chapter 209, hence 209 part 2.
The chapters are actually 2 part, like almost any other hundreds of todg chapters.
How many chapters of todg have you actually speed read?

 

[azraei97]

@exogriz
Hatigarm Scans always do better job rather than "no group"

 

[exogriz]

@babontil dude.... it's 209.5 not 209, so the additional part 2 is not necessary is it? unless the chapter specifically written as chapter 209 (part 1) and 209 (part 2). get it ?

@azraei97 i never said they're not did i ? im just saying the title is misleading. that's all. no need for the fans to get offended or something as im not insulting or anything.

 

[captain_crunch]

@exogriz

Your point about ".5" and "part 2" being redundant is very true, but I'm not sure if the uploaders would change it since they have been following the same format ever since the chapters began to be split in 2 at chapter 82. Hatigarm group also looks like they are following this format on their website ever since they picked it up about 90 chapters ago.

As for the suggestion about adding a "version 2" to the title, it is a valid idea for the uploader, especially since Hatigarm went back and redid the first 60 chapters. But I don't think the uploaders, especially if they are part of Hatigarm, would be happy about having to change their titles based on whether sniping occurs on Mangadex. It also looks like this is the first time the series has been sniped, unless previous ones have been removed. And Hatigarm released 209 on their site , 8 days ago on Jan 27. The snipe was uploaded about 9 days ago. Not sure why Hatigarm's version was uploaded here only just now, maybe the usual uploaders got confused.

 

[jokerxhisoka]

@captain_crunch Using "version 2" isn't a good idea because they aren't making a second version of someone else translation, but just their own version of it, and that would make it confusing. Saying it's a new version should be used only when the current iteration has something wrong and has to be substituted for a new one.