While you are right about this likely just being promotional, you should never underestimate the Japanese audience's capacity for bad taste.There's no way in hell something this good got axed.
There's no way in hell something this good got axed. Especially with a chapter like this one. Having a cute and cheerfully homicidal loli destroy your enemy's family jewels like that can only be said to be all kinds of cathartic to this manga's intended audience. And then, adding even more hilarity to it was the following page that shows all the onlooking boys' reactions. (And to have her ask if you and her are about to make babies now is just icing on the cake.)
It's an adaptation, so more likely than not it was just a promotional manga for the light novel. Which is a shame. Having the manga set this kinda tone from here on out? I could only imagine just how gloriously unhinged things in the LN get.
Hey, any LN readers out there? Just how unhinge does this story actually get? Remember to hide stuff under Spoilers.
Nope, just telling it how it is, if you see that as justification that's on you for overthinking it.The author is trying really hard to justify slavery.
The actual problem is the author seems to not really want to write this.There's no way in hell something this good got axed. Especially with a chapter like this one. Having a cute and cheerfully homicidal loli destroy your enemy's family jewels like that can only be said to be all kinds of cathartic to this manga's intended audience. And then, adding even more hilarity to it was the following page that shows all the onlooking boys' reactions. (And to have her ask if you and her are about to make babies now is just icing on the cake.)
It's an adaptation, so more likely than not it was just a promotional manga for the light novel. Which is a shame. Having the manga set this kinda tone from here on out? I could only imagine just how gloriously unhinged things in the LN get.
Hey, any LN readers out there? Just how unhinge does this story actually get? Remember to hide stuff under Spoilers.
I don't think I've ever seen an overbearing hero of justice type of protagonist. I think they're actually quite rare. I think that's just a trope that began for the purpose of satire, parody, or as caricature to justify having a "villain" as a main character or to let the audience see what the villain sees of the hero.Seeing that joke of a "hero" and "heroine" made me wonder: is that insufferingly overbearing "hero of justice" archetype really that popular anymore? I feel, lately, I've only seen it parodied rather than played straight, but that could just be a confirmation bias due to the media I consume.
Honestly, the hero's childhood friend is the one character I don't want to see end up with the protagonist. He wants to avoid NTR, and technically, he does avoid it as long as they're not romantically involved or interested in the hero to start with. The childhood friend is, and that one would actually be NTR.The MC basically ends up taking all the heroines except the closest one to him(his childhood friend though even in the current chapters I'm reading he might end up taking her away too) also he gets the Hero's mom and little sister in his harem later on and a literal archdemon who fell in love with his "evil" looking face. Also while the MC never becomes a harem-seeking protagonist and never really actively tries to pursue any girl he at least responds to their feelings once he knows they have them(yes they have sex, lots of it though the series is 16+ not 18 so the sex scenes are NOT described in depth)