Chiharu-kun wa Josou o Shitakunai

Joined
Mar 7, 2025
Messages
1
If this had actually happened, it probably would've been under the period of Slavery in its final moribund stage, and around the time in Japan where the class struggle manifested itself openly and in its fiercest form. This is because the same kind of thing also basically happened with Early Christianity: various sects had emerged in conjunction with the class struggle which was raging much more harder and fiercer as the system of slavery decayed even further and further. And in this case, and also in the headcanon that i'm cooking up, social conceptions of the revolutionary classes had emerged to facilitate this. In my headcanon, one of them is a particular sect which like its contemporaries, had rejected the oppression and subjugation of women, and the rejection also of the repressive and reactionary gender roles which was not only imposed by society, but was at its source facilitated by the very division of society into subordinated and oppressing classes, and which the solution is to bring down the rule of the oppressing classes and build (what unfortunately is the result of their social consciousness being limited by the social relations which they found themselves existing in, only of) an equitable society, with an equitable distribution of the products of labor (and not the abolition of classes altogether, which unfortunately at this time cannot be done, and was not conceived, again because of the limitations of their political economy as a consequence of the particular historical stage of society which they existed in, and also because the means of production did not yet have the capacity to not only feed the whole of society, but also have a surplus/excess of the products of labor, unlike with Capitalist societies, where precisely of its own fundamental shortcomings, this progressive feature of unprecedented surplus is also the bringer of its own periodic doom, and which must be replaced by Socialism and then be superseded by Communism). What was particularly distinct with the sect as compared with its contemporaries of a similar kind was that it had recognized that the repressive gender roles, gender norms, and gender inequality, are interconnected problems and which, although in its embryonic form, and which unfortunately was never able to be connected with the division of society into irreconcileable antagonistic classes, was conceived as historically constituted. This distinctive character of this particular sect was taken from the materialist school of Philosophy in Japan, the philosophical and politico-economic foundations of their older and present contemporaries, and from the practical experience of the group of people who formed the sect themselves, who were erudites and who for some were crossdressers/gender non-conforming men and women, while for others were what we would now transgender people.
 
Last edited:
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Nov 18, 2018
Messages
13,712
If this had actually happened, it probably would've been under the period of Slavery in its final moribund stage, and around the time in Japan where the class struggle manifested itself openly and in its fiercest form. This is because the same kind of thing also basically happened with Early Christianity: various sects had emerged in conjunction with the class struggle which was raging much more harder and fiercer as the system of slavery decayed even further and further. And in this case, and also in the headcanon that i'm cooking up, social conceptions of the revolutionary classes had emerged to facilitate this. In my headcanon, one of them is a particular sect which like its contemporaries, had rejected the oppression and subjugation of women, and the rejection also of the repressive and reactionary gender roles which was not only imposed by society, but was at its source facilitated by the very division of society into subordinated and oppressing classes, and which the solution is to bring down the rule of the oppressing classes and build (what unfortunately is the result of their social consciousness being limited by the social relations which they found themselves existing in, only of) an equitable society, with an equitable distribution of the products of labor (and not the abolition of classes altogether, which unfortunately at this time cannot be done, and was not conceived, again because of the limitations of their political economy as a consequence of the particular historical stage of society which they existed in, and also because the means of production did not yet have the capacity to not only feed the whole of society, but also have a surplus/excess of the products of labor, unlike with Capitalist societies, where precisely of its own fundamental shortcomings, this progressive feature of unprecedented surplus is also the bringer of its own periodic doom, and which must be replaced by Socialism and then be superseded by Communism). What was particularly distinct with the sect as compared with its contemporaries of a similar kind was that it had recognized that the repressive gender roles, gender norms, and gender inequality, are interconnected problems and which, although in its embryonic form, and which unfortunately was never able to be connected with the division of society into irreconcileable antagonistic classes, was conceived as historically constituted. This distinctive character of this particular sect was taken from the materialist school of Philosophy in Japan, the philosophical and politico-economic foundations of their older and present contemporaries, and from the practical experience of the group of people who formed the sect themselves, who were erudites and who for some were crossdressers/gender non-conforming men and women, while for others were what we would now transgender people.
zvoa0g.png
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top