God, I despise this bare-bones excuse of a human being. Ashley is, without question, the most indefensible violator one could imagine in any field remotely connected to data privacy or professional ethics.
First of all, she is constantly extorting her client for physical goods and bribes by abusing her position of power for personal gain, which violates ethical and often legal standards, though this is irrelevant since law isn't brought up in conversation in any meaningful manner other than when the protagonist points out her "violation of privacy". Coercion removes the client's free will, turning the exchange into exploitation rather than a legitimate business interaction. Such behavior undermines trust, professionalism, and integrity.
Second, by freely distributing highly sensitive and personal information to others without consent, the receptionist blatantly violates basic confidentiality. In any professional setting, this would be considered a gross violation of privacy rights, potentially exposing the client to reputational damage, social manipulation, and emotional distress. This behavior reflects an alarming disregard for professional ethics—it clearly exposes both her willful misconduct and profound incompetence.
Third, her persistent interference in the client’s (the protagonist’s) career path—despite clear, repeated objections—points to deliberate psychological manipulation. She prioritizes her personal preferences over the client’s autonomy, applying pressure to coerce alignment with her agenda. This is a classic display of paternalistic control cloaked in administrative oversight, with damaging implications for the client’s personal agency and mental well-being. She’s a manipulator.
Fourth, beyond the direct harm to the client, this receptionist’s behavior contributes to a toxic organizational culture. Her normalization of boundary violations, favoritism, and data misuse sets a dangerous precedent, weakening institutional trust and discouraging transparency or upward reporting of misconduct. She is, in effect, a vector of systemic corruption, compromising the guild’s core values and long-term credibility.
Alshely is not simply overstepping professional boundaries—she is engaging in a pattern of misconduct that is corrupt, psychologically harmful, and structurally damaging. Her continued presence in such a role would likely demoralize clients, deter participation, and undermine the guild’s ethical framework. Immediate corrective action, including imprisonment and PUBLIC BEHEADING is not only reccomended it is NECESSARY. The gods' negligent management of their fantasy realm has allowed for a demon to escape their dungeon and wear the skin of a receptionist lady, correcting their mistake and taking further measures to avoid repeat offenses takes precedent over all else.