28061792-06ad-42af-930c-50680f62aa55
T Toon_Jay Dex-chan lover Joined Apr 22, 2020 Messages 809 Aug 23, 2024 #2 Okay dawg, the translation is ight, but... "Childrens"... Children is already plural, no need for the 's'.
Okay dawg, the translation is ight, but... "Childrens"... Children is already plural, no need for the 's'.
L Light_of_War Active member Joined Aug 2, 2024 Messages 30 Aug 23, 2024 #3 Toon_Jay said: Okay dawg, the translation is ight, but... "Childrens"... Children is already plural, no need for the 's'. Click to expand... Corrected, thanks for your contribution!
Toon_Jay said: Okay dawg, the translation is ight, but... "Childrens"... Children is already plural, no need for the 's'. Click to expand... Corrected, thanks for your contribution!
pedantiq Supporter Joined Jun 18, 2018 Messages 621 Aug 30, 2024 #4 Thanks for picking the translations back up! Is there any chance you plan to fill in the 30s-70s gap, or is that licensed or somesuch?
Thanks for picking the translations back up! Is there any chance you plan to fill in the 30s-70s gap, or is that licensed or somesuch?
