He's explicitly said he doesn't care whatsoever what they're used for- that's a problem for the wielder and those associated with them. He's basically proven amoral, he just wants to make good swords and for people to not bother him otherwise.So... didn't he say he doesn't want his weapons used for like things needless killing and wars and stuff? So why is he arming 2 groups that apparently fight (seemingly to the death usually) on sight?? Like it seems like if humans run into demons it's usually "kill on sight" and same for demons to humans, so... won't arming both with God tier weapons probably start a war ?
Seiken no Katakanajisauce?
They were not meant to bash. That's also a myth. Swords have rather poor force transfer (they're balanced towards the hilt, not the business end), especially compared to blunt weapons and polearms. They were made to cut and thrust. But they handled hitting metal armour better than Japanese swords.European swords were made to essentially bash the enemy, rather than slice - and this is because European armor was so good.
Duelling swords were for an entirely different purpose than both Japanese swords, and the Western war swords. Duels were formal and usually with no or little armour. Those swords were also used as civilian self-defence weapons as they were generally lighter than war swords.European Sabres and Duelling swords were seen as superior, and given the materials, perhaps were.
It's only the fastest and greatest car if it's numbered 53.It's like a comic showing the VW Beetle as the worlds fastest and greatest car, when it's simply an alright functioning, unique looking car.
They're not? Spring steel, which was the most common in Europe at the time, was relatively uniform throughout.Every steel weapon is tempered with a flexible core and hardened edge.
Cool, didn't know about some of those.There were actually several techniques.
I can see why you're using quotes, since there are still drawbacks to them. The main one is that the edges become very brittle and chip easily. That would've been a much greater problem in Europe where they faced more metal armours.That's what makes japanese sword 'superior', because their technique of making is 'superior'... at least compared to rather simplistic method used elsewhere.
He's got cheat skills. Will probably help him out.Also, unless our guy has 'some' idea how the katanas were made, he is going to fail.
Oh, its most definitely fun to see an accurate portrayal of something in manga. As it can help to greatly build up the world and make it more learned rather than just slapping magic on everything.I usually find it interesting to see what mangas get right and wrong about things. It's usually easier to point out what they get right, since those things stick out more, and if it comes to interpretation I end to give them the benefit of a doubt. It's all for fun, not to complain, after all.
I haven't a clue where you got that idea from. Techniques for heat-treated, hardened, composite steels have appeared throughout the world contemporary with katana was what I was trying to convey. Damascus, toledo, bulat, bintie all terms from different cultures for the same concept.They're not? Spring steel, which was the most common in Europe at the time, was relatively uniform throughout.
So where did you get it from? Any I've seen are forged from a folded piece of steel and tempered to a much more even heat than Japanese style blades.I haven't a clue where you got that idea from.
I meant specifically for the magic metal he's using... it doesn't need that kinda method....Folding is just to even out the impurities in the steel. With pure enough steel, like modern steel, folding is pointless. I think that technically it does improve the durability by changing the shape of the crystalline structure, but that isn't maintained through the hardening process, as heating it up changes the structure back to "default". I'm not sure about that part, though, and I'd have to look it up to confirm/debunk.
The soft/hard method is a bit different, though. Spring steel has a uniform hardening which can flex quite a lot, but if it flexes too much, it snaps. Spring steel also requires a relatively more pure steel to not be too unreliable. I think that's because the tempering process is quite precise, and impurity can change that too much, but I'm not sure.
Differential hardening on the other hand doesn't flex (well, it does flex, but not significantly), but deforms and bends with too much force. However, that can be bent back, so the sword isn't completely destroyed (unlike with LotR shows, you can't reforge a sword without completely redoing the entire process).
You also get a harder edge, which means it will retain a sharp edge longer, but it's more brittle.
You get these advantages and drawbacks regardless of steel purity, since the rely on the hardening and tempering process.
Well, when it comes to smithing, he's the wizard who does it.I meant specifically for the magic metal he's using... it doesn't need that kinda method....
Ah, I did miss that, though my point still technically stands because they say her old name was Thunder Sword and it's changed to Quick Thunder. It would make more sense for them to say that her name changed from Lightning Blade to Quick Lightning.My friend, go re-read this chapter, because you apparently missed the entire conversation in the chapter they had about her nickname.
That's literally the point.....Well, when it comes to smithing, he's the wizard who does it.
But for a discussion about forging techniques, just saying, "a wizard did it," is an unsatisfying answer, and not the point of the discussion at all.That's literally the point.....