Kanojo no ie kara tsūgakusuru yuri - Oneshot

[MangaDex]

 

[Jayswing103]

Cute.

 

[dddictionary]

hot

 

[Dibella]

Y if its girl it's hot. If it's guys it's disgusting

 

[zips]

that’d be homophobia, my friend

 

[AkodoRyu]

that’d be homophobia, my friend

I honestly don't think it is. If you are a straight male, I think being disgusted by sex with another man is a fairly natural reaction. At the very least, it's impossible to understand the attractiveness of the concept - you can say you do, but you don't. Homophobia starts when you start messing with people for whom those feeling are natural.

On the other hand, as someone who loves women, I find anyone loving women perfectly understandable. Hence, it's easier to channel yuri.

 

[CronosusCZ]

hehehe.. thats cute

 

[henman]

Men are simple creatures. Man x man is no-no for them, but woman x woman is a big OK. I like their simplicity

 

[Matthewkeen]

nice.

 

[Zhou]

I would be dead at 7 AM.

 

[Sisiyoru]

@AkodoRyu
Who are you and why are you so wise?

Anyway, this is a very cute manga thanks for the translations!

 

[HauntedPizza]

I always dig the uniform swap after sex type of punchline.

 

[AriWasTaken]

@Sisiyoru

I’m glad you enjoyed it! This was my first time translating so if anything’s a little off my apologies!

 

[YuriIsTooLewd]

Nice chapter!

@AkodoRyu

you can say you do, but you don't.

Nope. I do agree that if a man is not repulsed by imagining themselves having sex with an other man, then they are not straight by definition as they are fine with the idea (maybe they are bisexual). But I don't agree with the understanding. It's actually pretty easy if you know what women like in men (i.e why they are not all lesbians), the problem is the willingness to imagine yourself in their position fantasizing about something you find disgusting. It's possible, albeit most won't do it, and for a reasonable reason. Maybe there are easier ways, dunno.

Homophobia starts when you start messing with people for whom those feeling are natural.

I get what you mean, but no. Imagine a random dude suddenly saying to you that they are gay. Then imagine them randomly saying that they are straight, or imagine a girl saying that she is straight. If in the first case your first thought is "that's disgusting"/"you're disgusting"/"I wish you good luck, but I better watch by back" then you are homophobe. Only if it's the same in all cases (e.g. "Why are you saying that now?") then you are not.

 

[Sameragamer143]

Thanke for the oneshot i wish this have more cause this is gonna be funny and wholesome (ﾉ´･ω･)ﾉ ﾐ ┻━┻

 

[aloysiusks]

lol, rekt

 

[210astat]

lol

 

[AkodoRyu]

@YuriIsTooLewd

As to the first paragraph

Maybe understanding was a wrong word to use, but I'm not really sure what else would fit - empathizing? The point I was trying to make is that I don't think you can generate feelings of attraction to the sex you are not attracted to, but I think you are making more or less the same point so there is no reason to drill that.

As to the second pragraph

I took it as we were discussing the reaction to the depiction of a specific kind of intimacy, rather than to individuals or orientation as a whole. As in "watching two girls going at it is hot, but watching two guys is disgusting" king of a starting point, which I don't think is intrinsically homophobic.

Also, I get your point, but I still think that unless the feelings are externalized into action, it still should be considered as tolerance. Letting other people live their lives the way they want to, even if the idea itself is repulsive to one's worldview is still a decent stance to take. You can't really force acceptance anyway, so as long as one doesn't infringe on others' freedoms, I don't think there is any point in branding them as a homophobe, even if by strict definition they should probably be considered as one.

Well, that's a lot of serious discussion for a cute short about hating mornings and picking up the wrong clothes to wear.

 

[kuf]

nice

 

[Danglark]

all sorts of nice.