Koushaku Chakunan Koushoku Monogatari ~Isekai Harem Eiyuu Senki~ - Vol. 1 Ch. 3 - Aristocratic Way

[MangaDex]

 

[Sp12er]

That past page is something else

 

[SalvySaroj]

Damn... It looks good if mc in this side🤔
But again where the freaking proper fan-service worthy of "Erotica" tag

 

[Sp12er]

That past page is something else

Last page of 3 successive head of a Noble family, indeed its quite picturesque.
And that panel truly embody the difference between noble and mud blood.

Actually that's really the most apt comparison, The nobles in this story is basically all Purebloods, they only marry other nobles to keep the purity of their bloods simply because Purebloods in this series is basically a superhuman with extreme mastery of magic, can't even be killed by sickness and even lethal attack are only truly lethal for them if they are decapitated. Most Purebloods age over 100 YO and they don't get weakened when they age, they just suddenly lost control of their magic and become extremely vulnerable like any normal human does when they are near the limit of their age span. That's why his grandpa is still so active in the field.

 

[IdidNineEleven]

"Earth's history has proven that an army of citizens that tries to defend their freedom are incredibly strong." Has such a thing ever really happened in Japan? In East Asia? China kicked out the Japanese, but that wasn't an isolated city, and the Japanese experience wasn't isolated from the island advance of the Americans. For Vauban and Marx, cities are unsustainable under siege because they must import food from the countryside to sustain their population, and this is what defines cities (Anti-Duhring).

 

[nobody2002]

"Earth's history has proven that an army of citizens that tries to defend their freedom are incredibly strong." Has such a thing ever really happened in Japan? In East Asia? China kicked out the Japanese, but that wasn't an isolated city, and the Japanese experience wasn't isolated from the island advance of the Americans. For Vauban and Marx, cities are unsustainable under siege because they must import food from the countryside to sustain their population, and this is what defines cities (Anti-Duhring).

Vietnam twice.

 

[IdidNineEleven]

Vietnam twice.

And which two cities under siege during war defeated their besiegers without assistance from outside the besieged city?

 

[nobody2002]

"Earth's history has proven that an army of citizens that tries to defend their freedom are incredibly strong." Has such a thing ever really happened in Japan? In East Asia?

And which two cities under siege during war defeated their besiegers without assistance from outside the besieged city?

That wasn't your original question, though. So, the answer to your original question, is yes it has. Vietnam, twice. They kicked out the French and the US. The MC's statement mentions nothing about a "besieged city defeating the besiegers without assistance". Rather, the statement is referencing any situation where people are fighting for their freedom against an oppressive enemy are not easily defeated. The MC never insinuated that they would lose. He stated they believed they would win but the damage on them would have been much worse. And the worst case scenario would be all the civilians dying. It would have been a hollow victory.

 

[IdidNineEleven]

You don't need to restate every line from that page for me. Not only can I also reopen the same page as you, I can even read the story including each line as one cohesive narrative:

The MC's statement mentions nothing about a "besieged city defeating the besiegers without assistance". Rather, the statement is referencing any situation where people are fighting for their freedom against an oppressive enemy are not easily defeated.

In this chapter it is a city which is conquered. The protagonist did not make his statement at random. The author did not write at random.

That wasn't your original question, though. So, the answer to your original question /.../

I already answered it with the same (China) and tossed that answer aside because it is useless. There is no support to the protagonist's and author's claim that "citizens" (codified classes in medieval society like burgher, 町人, or citizoyen (where "citizen" comes from)) are strong under siege.

 

[nobody2002]

You don't need to restate every line from that page for me. Not only can I also reopen the same page as you, I can even read the story including each line as one cohesive narrative:

You may be able to read the content, you just seem to dense to understand it. That is why I throughly explained it to you, but you still seem to miss the point.

In this chapter it is a city which is conquered. The protagonist did not make his statement at random. The author did not write at random.

Again, the MC's statement was a reference that people fighting for their freedom are hard to defeat. Which he is applying to this situation. Doesn't matter if it a country, a city, or their dwelling. I don't know why that is hard for you to understand.

There is no support to the protagonist's and author's claim that "citizens" (codified classes in medieval society like burgher, 町人, or citizoyen (where "citizen" comes from)) are strong under siege.

Yes, actually there is evidence of this. All of human history!! Which, again, the MC references!!! Also, look up the 3:1 ratio rule of combat.

I'm done trying to hold your hand and explain something so simple. Have a nice day. Or not. Either way, I don't care.