Because that makes so much sense. I mean, it's not what he's saying, but it's what he's saying."If you really like her, break up with her!"
While that's way past by now, that's pretty much how marriages has been for most of history. Marry first, fall in love second. While there are obvious downsides like that not being assured, it does tend to create more stable marriages since from the start it's based on working things out together, so if problems appear (and they probably will), the tools are already there to solve them."If you set your minds to it, you can fall for each other."
And there are tons of stories that are based on that.It doesn't matter how you met, as long as the meeting wasn't catastrophic.
While it's not wrong (other than that she's not forced to "lie" and say she's doing it for love), it's not his place to say so, he's saying it for his own interests, and by doing so he's looking down on both of them. So I wouldn't call him sensible.I agreed with making Yuzuru aware that it's an arranged marriage she can't say no to.
Totally agree on this, the web/light novel is so far ahead that 10years+ is not even a joke 😭thanks for the translation.
considering how slow the chapters release I wish the story would progress a bit more each chapter. at this pace it will take 10+ years until they finally realise they like each other :/
Unfortunately, arranged marriages are (heh) arranged by a third party who might or might not have their own designs on the matter. And might, directly or indirectly, apply pressure for the marriage to go forward. Of course, forcing a marriage of others because of personal interest regardless of their opinion or feelings is neither the responsible nor the reasonable thing, but the arranging party and/or the groom/bride wasn't always reasonable historically...There's certainly no rule against falling in love with an arranged marriage partner. At the end of the day, you need to meet the person you start to like somehow. If you are compatible, then you are compatible. It doesn't matter how you met, as long as the meeting wasn't catastrophic. Though there are weirdos who actually require a strange first meeting, including something that would seem abysmal to others.
So at least be with somebody who will treat her as a person and not as a trophy or worse. But you can see that both families are pressuring the pair to go forward and get together.
What's reasonable and responsible is very subjective. In cases that involves long-standing families and businesses it might not be the absolute best choice for those particular individuals, but it might be what keeps the jobs of a ton of people working for them. The happiness of two versus the livelihood of many.Of course, forcing a marriage of others because of personal interest regardless of their opinion or feelings is neither the responsible nor the reasonable thing, but the arranging party and/or the groom/bride wasn't always reasonable historically...
I'm not sure how people can think that aranged marriage are bad because someone else aranged them when the divorce rate of mariage aranged by the people who marry themself is at more than 70% in the firt ten year...Unfortunately, arranged marriages are (heh) arranged by a third party who might or might not have their own designs on the matter. And might, directly or indirectly, apply pressure for the marriage to go forward. Of course, forcing a marriage of others because of personal interest regardless of their opinion or feelings is neither the responsible nor the reasonable thing, but the arranging party and/or the groom/bride wasn't always reasonable historically...
That's a standard for humanity. It's the same everywhere, people judge other by their own prejudice and never for who people realy are.Is it normal for Japanese to talk so much shit to a person they've just met?
Like, at least get to know the other party for a week before you start claiming that you know what's best, Jesus.
It's in asian culture to talk pointless thing and boasting their own opinion before they met an agreement to understanding whether they can be friend or not. It's a culture that exist among the worker class people (not entrepreneurs).Is it normal for Japanese to talk so much shit to a person they've just met?
Like, at least get to know the other party for a week before you start claiming that you know what's best, Jesus.
I agree on that: they suit the other pretty well but for now they are "together" out of convenience and it shows. I'm not sure about them naturally getting together, they seemed very apart in school with her being the "cold flower" of the class and him being uninterested in romance at first. Maybe they would have been together in time, but both families' rushing matters might make the whole thing explode in their faces. Which, isn't it still the plan AFAIF?She's a pretty good match for his dream requirements, though. They even get along well, so the personalities aren't a bad match. At the end of the day, I reckon neither of them actually wanted to remain single forever. This just came about much sooner than they would have expected. Yet if they had met under less forceful circumstances, they might have become a couple more naturally. It might not have been impossible for their parents to arrange that, but it certainly would have been a lot of tedious and delicate work.
In those extreme situations, usually there are other ways to solve them that don't require "sacrificing" a family member. Also, I personally think that demanding or offering an arranged marriage to seal a business/political deal doesn't seem like a trustworthy practice in this time and age.What's reasonable and responsible is very subjective. In cases that involves long-standing families and businesses it might not be the absolute best choice for those particular individuals, but it might be what keeps the jobs of a ton of people working for them. The happiness of two versus the livelihood of many.
Of course, "personal interest" can be anything from "I want more power, regardless of who suffers," to, "I want my future family to be safe and secure," so it's not like it's a one-solution problem.
Probably because many of those marriages are on unequal terms or stances, and either of the spouses cannot annul or divorce that easily, regardless of how they're treated. There are many cases in the present time where arranged marriages cannot be annulled due to familiar pressure, economic conditions to outright threats or abuse.I'm not sure how people can think that aranged marriage are bad because someone else aranged them when the divorce rate of mariage aranged by the people who marry themself is at more than 70% in the firt ten year...
Me neither, but it's the view some of them have.Also, I personally think that demanding or offering an arranged marriage to seal a business/political deal doesn't seem like a trustworthy practice in this time and age.
My point of view is that I find it less interesting to talk about the extremes, since then you're delving into black or white reasoning, which is often self-evident if you share even some base values. It also tends to diminish that the vast majority lies in the large spectrum between. Which is applicable to many topics.However, take into account that I was talking in the extreme of the interested parties' selfishness.
I agree on that: they suit the other pretty well but for now they are "together" out of convenience and it shows. I'm not sure about them naturally getting together, they seemed very apart in school with her being the "cold flower" of the class and him being uninterested in romance at first. Maybe they would have been together in time, but both families' rushing matters might make the whole thing explode in their faces. Which, isn't it still the plan AFAIF?