@KajurN
That's not a source, anyone can edit a wikipedia. To me this looks like a woman drew it desperate for cash and that is more evidential through her art than a non existent ID. unless someone can link a real identity to them. What's worse: A gay guy ugly drawing women desperate for cash or a paedophile woman ugly drawing girls desperate for cash? They're still ugly drawings least to me and how manga look is important for anyone with standards. I consider myself to have standards. If you had standards you would have looked for the source of your claim, which does not exist, unlike the real wikipedia.
@WhatTheCarl
That's just your opinion. One I did not ask for. No one did. If you want to actually refute anything I've said or otherwise contribute to the conversation feel free to do so. But this isn't your blog.
@branch
Why he has to refute anything when your claims were groundless from the beginning? You failed to check the author's gender (his blog https://ameblo.jp/orizarot/ [性別]男性), and, after getting used to the moe art style, you lashed out when saw someone breaking the canon. It's not the art that is ugly, but your heart.
@vodkavodka
"Feel free" implies an invitation to join the conversation, a mere suggestion if you will, I also afterwards implied there's other ways to contribute to the conversation as-well so don't claim anything else because reading is not difficult if you dared to try. I don't care for your insults. Again, this is not your blog either. And I did not fail to check his blog. That's not evidence that would hold up in court. It's not concrete. It does not convince me nor should you accept something just because it's claimed somewhere. That's not scientific. You really have to wonder why it's so hard to prove someone's gender. If they are the actual gender they claim to be this shouldn't be difficult, but alas you can't. I'm really not sure what you're on about with your "breaking the canon" projection. Is it in the dictionary? But a projection is a mere projection. It's illogical and personal attacks are not part of the debate. I'm talking about the manga in question. Your insults are in a language only you speak and frankly off-topic. Care to stay on topic will you?
Man, after reading all the way to chapter 183 and then coming back here, it’s just soooo different. Not just the art style, but the overall feel. It’s juso innocent. It’s still mostly innocent anyways, except for those two.
Whoa the nostalgia is hitting me hard and it wasnt that long ago that i read this lol.
Art style sure looks a lot simpler here lol first time reading through this i remember thinking it was pretty different to most other stuff but now i really enjoy it, instead of the usual cute look almost everyone goes for the realistic proportions and facial types really do make it more erotic, especially later on when the author gets a lot better and a lot more detailed.