Oversimplified SCP - Ch. 153 - Log Of Anomalous Items, Vol II

[NamelessSoldier]

I mean, a solution to the 682 problem could very well be "stop trying to contain it and stop caring."

A terrible solution. But a solution to the problem of trying to contain it nonetheless. You just to reframe it so that it's no longer a problem.

 

[Curbdash]

Rubber duck programming was an anomoly the whole time.

 

[daichinobakudan]

The boxing glove one is too hilarious. That simple little implication that they had to test it to know what it does is comedy genius.

 

[psychicprogrammer]

@Goldenzeal there is the 001 proposal "a good boy", which does have predictions of SCPs.

 

[Goldenzeal]

@psychicprogrammer

well, SCP-001 are lore-wise a " fake" SCP´s to hide the real 001 from everyone but the 05 council members.
So the chance that the good boy is the "real" SCP 001 is pretty low.
In which case, they wouldn't have the ability lore-wise, to actually know an SCP was an SCP ahead of time as I said...

Personally, I believe there would be little reason to go that far to hide anything that isn't an easily misused end of the world/universe SCP.
Even if it could be used to possibly find other SCP´s of that nature.

 

[PramTheOracle]

Lmao these items

Also oof that last one makes me hurt

 

[Alrange]

Impossible sqare-cle > impossible triangle
But could these anomalous objects be the product of other scps (say a sketchbook that turns ideas into reality), or even Dr. Wondertainment's prototypes?
Could there be unforeseen possibilities if other scps came into contact?

 

[urtoast]

Just learned about the rubber duck thing yesterday from https://mangadex.org/chapter/1141250/ before reading this SCP chapter just now.

@Alrange objects or anomalies caused by the effects of SCPs receive designations with the same number as the original SCP with some sort of additional alphanumeric designation such as "-A". These here were all stand-alone anomalous items.

 

[XyRwins]

that square inside a circle should be illegal what the heck

 

[Dragorage]

This objects keep getting more interesting 🧐

 

[CyanHide]

I wish the rubber duck was real...

 

[SalmonsBeLike]

For the last one, either the measurements refer to different things (7cm = square perimeter and 3cm = circle radius is fine) and the researcher was just both lazy and bad at maths ...
... or it should really be classified as Safe for its ability to locally affect measurements, or at least heavily studied. Because if measurements are correct but incoherent ("Square shouldn't be in circle, wtf") and the reasoning is valid ("Size of square and circle imply an intersection there"), then either the theory is wrong and scientific research on the phenomenon should be strongly encouraged, which is most likely not the case otherwise the researcher wouldn't have felt it looked "wrong", or the measurements really are altered by the object and should be investigated the same.
Also, never underestimate measuring errors. "Faster than light neutrinos" anybody?

Rubber duck was aight tho.

 

[OverpoweredMan]

lmao, that computer that turns things into cheese.

 

[Drifter]

That duck is not some triviality. World leaders should be paying to visit that thing.

 

[yinkid123]

The duck one is real btw, in engineering and computer programming there are ducks. If you have a problem you tell the duck your line of code or what you built and how, you keep doing it until you realize how dumb you are and where you messed up