@Thrembs:
Super-belatedly (I'm re-reading this now and I wasn't @-ed so had no idea I had a response half a year ago XD), I certainly do believe that authorial intent (and/or the apparent fingerprints thereof), matter as far as the moral implications of writing go. Yet, I'm not convinced "this dude is basically a lady" has any real moral implications here? (If so they would seem to be subtle?) To be clear, it can certainly be bad
writing in some cases. But it had seemed to me like insisting that "girls be depicted like girls" and "guys be depicted like guys" instead,
would actually present an ethical problem (reinforcing gender stereotypes and/or invalidating various sorts of gender-expression outside one's gender)—thus, to say "it isn't gay because it doesn't look gay" seemed potentially problematic to me.
None of which is to say that reading this needs to be your thing. And I think I get what you were saying (e.g. "I am dubious of the claim that this is representatively gay, and this relationship that appears strikingly similar to a heterosexual one is not what I am here for"), but that's not how it parsed for me. Er, six months ago, that is. Though I guess I still think the phrasing choice is questionable.
(Having said all that, honestly, the protagonist here didn't seem particularly girly to me. But that's entirely besides the point XD)
(Side note: Yaoi being an exploration of sexuality at a "comfortable distance" is a sort of horrible thought that I had not been explicitly introduced to, given the rampant toxic thinking and hand-waving of consent problems in the genre... yikes.)
Anyway, feel free to ignore this as I'm sure this response is past some statute of limitations or some-such ^^;