If "Words not in red are meant to deceive me" is true, then why did the red words "Ushiromiya Natsuhi is not the culprit" not satisfy you at all? Why would Battler have to prove anything behind the words? The rules of Knox may demand an explanation, by why would Knox's red words be any more powerful than Battler's?
Red truth is truth that does not need an explanation, right? Isn't that what was first established?
Mhh. This is pissing me off lol