Interesting to see the some binary reactions as I reflect upon my own thoughts on it and the nature of audiences more generally. I think I'd call Monster #8 "A pretty vanilla, by the numbers classic shounen kaiju story that failed to become something more yet was also solidly executed", which is simultaneously maybe not what many were hoping for yet also ok. I was thinking about this the other day on the subject of movies, and how professional (or even amateur but serious) critics or film enthusiasts view various films vs general audiences. Sometimes critical reception is pretty equal across the board, some movies are just totally mediocre, some movies really do deserve universal acclaim, and most fall in the middle. But every once in awhile you see a serious split: critics & enthusiasts hate or love a movie and general audiences feel the opposite. There can be a few causes, but I think the most basic split is simple and not the "fault" of anyone or a criticism of critics or audiences either, but just a fundamental fact: critics and enthusiasts just plain watch a crapload more movies. I think to some extent that inevitably biases that audience to weight sheer novelty higher. Most of human culture is some extent endless remixes of the same themes that in turn have been part of the human experience for millennia, and plenty of mediums develop their own well known styles of arcs. That's not a bad thing at all, but it does mean if you watch enough you're going to see a great deal of repeats and might end up really craving something fresh.
But most normal people only have time/money/inclination to watch or read a few things a year. So a "pro" audience might watch a fairly straight forward action movie or whatever and be like "this is just like Movie A, B, C, D, & E from the last 10 years this is boring", but if most of the audience hasn't seen
any of those movies, well it's still fresh to them right? Plus there are constant new humans being born, and however classic we think certain stories are we all saw/read growing up, well every single day there's going to be someone new who has never read them. The web comic XKCD has a now classic one on "
Today's Lucky 10000" that illustrates the phenomenon in a very positive way.
So I think the same thing sort of applies to manga. Probably the kind of person who would be on mangadex at all reads a lot more manga and has done so for a lot longer than the average, and like holy crap are a lot of us getting
old man, like damn where did the decades go??? I personally think this story could have done more with its spin, as others say more with the middle-aged aspect of Kafka, more with the world building and so on. At the same time, if this was some kid's first shounen kaiju, well I can't really say it's particularly bad? It did the standard arcs and hit all the standard moments but in a decent enough way. The small variations were actually pretty decent. Some of us may have gotten sucked in when normally this is the sort of story we wouldn't bother with anymore because it seemed like it was going to be a serious twist on the standard instead of exactly the standard with a somewhat different coat of paint, but it's a decent coat of paint? I think me from 25 years ago would have thought it was reasonably fun. So yeah.
This though holy crap calm down folks. 129 chapters reaching a clear standard denouement is not a freaking axe.