Ore ni Trauma wo Ataeta Joshi-tachi ga Chirachira Mitekuru kedo, Zannen desu ga Teokure desu - Vol. 6 Ch. 26.1 - 「The Worst Outcome」

[Eighty-six]

Also - notice that Glasses Sensei only stepped in the moment he was about to hit a girl. Yes, she ran in shouting "what are you kids doing? Stop that everyone!" and then....they both just stood there watching.

If I didn't know any better I'd expect for him to beat up the teacher too, keep the combo going

 

[Senros]

Blood for the Blood God!

And mate, don't worry about the delays. You are doing God's work by translating this and you are doing a really good job at it. Still real life is more important. Don't exhaust yourself too much for strangers (some of which are pretty ungrateful and think they deserve to read everything they want for free and that translators are, in a sense, their slaves.)

 

[DARKWINGS_XD]

your chance bro, beat em all . we're with you.

 

[DeathkaiserG]

Bro's Hands is Rated E for Everyone!!! Good show

Edit: a smart as he is, i wonder if he planned something in case if the teacher double down on the lie in the first place.

 

[deandering]

Here’s the kind of MC I’ve been waiting for. Someone who fights back with violence against violence, not with some stupid, pointless reasoning.

 

[deandering]

When he was being ganged up on, the teacher just stood by and watched. But when he tried to fight back against the student who instigated everything, the teacher stepped in to stop him. What a terrible teacher completely unfair and biased.

 

[MasterKurosawaKakeru]

maybe legally, morally? NAH, if would be something the kids swing once at him, but they were literally ganging up on him, beating him 3v1 while he begged them to stop and while the rest of the kids cheered (which means they might even join given the opportunity). At that point, I think you should be able to defend yourself by ANY MEANS NECESSARY. I would say that even grabbing a gun and starting to blast should be a reasonable response. You can literally die by getting beaten by a single person, now imagine 3

That's - no, morally self defense needs to be proportional as well. You can't go around killing people because they caused some amount of harm to you, in no world is that acceptable. If he reasonably thought he was in danger of dying, lethal means would be potentially justifiable, but as we've seen, he endured it until the teachers came and was capable of stopping them at any point. At no point was his life in actual danger, and at no point would he be justified in shooting these kids up. What the hell is this argument even.

 

[DBAV]

That's - no, morally self defense needs to be proportional as well. You can't go around killing people because they caused some amount of harm to you, in no world is that acceptable. If he reasonably thought he was in danger of dying, lethal means would be potentially justifiable, but as we've seen, he endured it until the teachers came and was capable of stopping them at any point. At no point was his life in actual danger, and at no point would he be justified in shooting these kids up. What the hell is this argument even.

From a legal point of view he was literally being lynched, being used to violence and wounds,being strong are not important, if he claims that being lynched made him enter a frenzy then no amount of whining is going to win the case.
I'm from Spain so I'm used to shitty self-defense laws but even a country as pro-criminal as mine couldn't condemn the kid.

 

[Valkyria-Edge]

Bro has the reaction time of a glacier.

again easy to say dumb shit like this when you never experienced it or well you just love showing how retarded you are i guess

 

[Statyc]

Here’s the kind of MC I’ve been waiting for. Someone who fights back with violence against violence, not with some stupid, pointless reasoning.

And no free pass, either. Doesn't matter if she (the girl classmate) didn't actually throw the punch, she ordered it to be done.

When he was being ganged up on, the teacher just stood by and watched. But when he tried to fight back against the student who instigated everything, the teacher stepped in to stop him. What a terrible teacher completely unfair and biased.

Himiyama (blonde teacher) I get. She's obviously stunned and frozen in shock. Especially when Kokonoe started fighting back.

Suzuka (glasses teacher) wasn't quite getting the same attention, but I imagine she was stunned, too, until there was a pause in the ass whoopings.

 

[Statyc]

again easy to say dumb shit like this when you never experienced it or well you just love showing how retarded you are i guess

This whole sequence can take place in under 30 seconds.

And, if the observers are shocked, that's plenty of time to hand out naps.

 

[Grailm]

Good man. That's actual equality right there. Equal rights and equal lefts.

 

[kaminomikan]

That wasn't Einhart. Einhart was the twintail green haired girl. The one who did it was the white haired one which name I forgot.

yeah, rewatched the ep, and it was Rinne... still such a satisfying ep.

What happened was that her bullies broke her Grandfather's keepsake and locked her up to prevent her from visiting her Grandfather on his deathbed.

bro... if "they" bitch about spoilers is all yours....

 

[WillTell]

Violence is not the answer, kids. It's the question and the answer is yes.

 

[Joe17mama]

one thing is saying that her actions are "not as bad" but that doesn't mean she didn't deserve violence back. If you incide violence, you should be prepared to receive it, there's a reason why calling for violence is illegal

She doesn't deserve violence back because she is a girl and he's a guy, and there is a inherent differential in terms of physical strength. No matter how justified or rational your logic is in saying she also should get hit by Kokonoe, that simply doesn't pass for what society considers to be a well-adjusted person. It would become an action that is antisocial, something that goes against the cohesion of the in-group/community you belong to and would not spell good state of affairs. Women are more vulnerable than men, and they will receive this privilege for eternity, or as long as that part of sexual dimorphism exists.

While I too believe in an eye-for-eye sentiment as for as consequentialism goes, I draw the line at antisocial behavior, because the kind of person I want to become is a prosocial man. I understand that there is a contradiction/hypocrisy there, but it's a hypocrisy that society demands of me if I want to establish myself as a well-adjusted man. I don't needlessly moralize any more than that, so as long as my actions are conducive to prosocial outcomes, and avoid antisocial outcomes.

You can fall on this sword if you want, it's just that you will likely pay the cost of being a social outcast who will hit women (no matter how justified you are, which doesn't matter since there exists no conception of a perceived, sufficient justification in society for which a man can lay his hands on a woman). It's not necessarily a prescriptive statement as much as it is a descriptive statement, in a way. By logic and assuming equality/no discrimination or double standards on the basis of gender, you would be right, and yet, it is an action that will demonstrably have horrible social consequences as a man. 99% of women will get the ick and be disgusted at such a man and will outright eliminate him as a romantic prospect or even just a friendship/social connection prospect. If you're willing to pay that price, go ahead. I'm not judging or moralizing any more than that one way or the other, but I wonder if such an outlook is conducive to being able to live a fulfilling life as a man in society.

Indulging in ethics/morality is great, until it severely clashes with practicality/utility in real life. Most people understandably end up choosing the latter, because humans are social creatures, and in many ways, being in a bad standing with society in general (due to what would be perceived as antisocial, violent tendencies against a vulnerable demographic of people society has deemed as requiring of special protection/privileges), would spell death or a fate as similarly horrid as a man.

 

[cjlouotaku416]

Kazuma must be proud of him! ✊

 

[cjlouotaku416]

Kazuma must be proud of him! ✊

 

[Reina4444]

stand your ground, soldier

 

[Cobaltzero]

And on the 6th day, God said let there be hands.
and they were and he saw that they were good.

 

[xAKLx]

She doesn't deserve violence back because she is a girl and he's a guy, and there is a inherent differential in terms of physical strength.

nah, fuck that. equal rights equal left. There is a differential in terms of physical strength between 1 guy and 3 guys, and she was cheering and egging on the 3 guys

No matter how justified or rational your logic is in saying she also should get hit by Kokonoe, that simply doesn't pass for what society considers to be a well-adjusted person

because society doesn't really believe in equal rights. If you don't want equal rights, then women can return to the kitchen and become baby-making machines. In my case, I do believe in equal rights, but we can't be which part we want to make equal and which one we don't

Women are more vulnerable than men, and they will receive this privilege for eternity, or as long as that part of sexual dimorphism exists.

In general, but some men are obviously waaay more vulnerable than other men (and women) and nobody cares, so fuck that shit, ppl should not be violent or call for violence in general, we don't need this cuck shit of "well they are weaker so they deserve violence even less" NAH, equality my friend, nobody should get beaten

because the kind of person I want to become is a prosocial man

Good for you, but if I've learn something, it's that defending yourself is part of being social, because nobody wants to be friends or partners with a loser to get taken advantage of, unless they want to be fake friends and take advantage of that person

but it's a hypocrisy that society demands of me if I want to establish myself as a well-adjusted man. I don't needlessly moralize any more than that, so as long as my actions are conducive to prosocial outcomes, and avoid antisocial outcomes.

If you were a white person during the civil rights protests, you would be exactly the kind of person MLK was talking about in his Letter from Birmingham Jail, the white moderate, who MLK deemed to serve as a greater obstacle to the rights of black ppl than the overt racism fucks.

It's not necessarily a prescriptive statement as much as it is a descriptive statement, in a way.

Then this has no meaning, after all the MC is already a social outcast for not fault of his own, it would be better for him to make them scared

99% of women will get the ick and be disgusted at such a man and will outright eliminate him as a romantic prospect

Yeah, and those girls were literally calling for him to get beaten into a pulp, at that point there was nothing else that could be done to salvage anything.

but I wonder if such an outlook is conducive to being able to live a fulfilling life as a man in society.

Sometimes you need to be the change you want in the world. Not many decades ago, being gay was seen by most as something bad; now it is normalized in civilized society.

Indulging in ethics/morality is great, until it severely clashes with practicality/utility in real life. Most people understandably end up choosing the latter, because humans are social creatures, and in many ways, being in a bad standing with society in general (due to what would be perceived as antisocial, violent tendencies against a vulnerable demographic of people society has deemed as requiring of special protection/privileges), would spell death or a fate as similarly horrid as a man.

This is one of the main reasons why bullied kids don't defend themselves btw, they think ppl will look at them as the problem and as aggressive, and they are right, what they don't get is that not fighting back is much worse