She's been a freaky psycho girl since she was little, and I bet on the last page, her husband gets poisoned by her
fixed <3
Im not even sure I understand what her point is? Like yeah, its bad so its wrong? At least with the second thing you can argue semantics about the correct thing to do not necersaryily being the morally right thing. But this just feels like a translation error"Is it wrong if it's a bad thing?" is the younger sibling of "Just because you're correct doesn't mean you're right."
I don't think this is a case of zero empathy. I think it's a case of extreme empathy run amok. She's acutely aware of the emotions of her victims, and that's what's driving her cruelty.The Perfect Combo for the Most Evil Creature : Zero Empathy with the power to be loved by almost anybody.
That's what the older brother said, and we haven't seen any evidence to the contrary.The mom died at least ...from what I remember
The phrasing is ambiguous, but that's not necessarily a translation error; it could be that the source was ambiguous. From context, I think it's a contrast between personal values and societal norms. Like, from her perspective, if she enjoys hurting people and no one stops her, is there any reason why she should stop herself? Clearly she doesn't think so.Im not even sure I understand what her point is? Like yeah, its bad so its wrong? At least with the second thing you can argue semantics about the correct thing to do not necersaryily being the morally right thing. But this just feels like a translation error
No, it was quite obvious that she was maximum evil... we just didn't know she was this powerful.holy. we knew she was evil with what she did to Yotsuha as a child but we did not know she was this evil