Sensei Nisshi: Homura-sensei wa Tabun Motenai - Vol. 3 Ch. 14

Dex-chan lover
Joined
Aug 27, 2025
Messages
470
thanks for the translation! there were 3 mistakes on page 11:
1. "we getting friendly" should be "us getting friendly"
2. "i might end up falling for you all over again" should be "i might end up falling for her all over again"
3. "that you still like me?" should be "that you still like her?"
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
May 10, 2019
Messages
1,167
thanks for the translation! there were 3 mistakes on page 11:
1. "we getting friendly" should be "us getting friendly"
2. "i might end up falling for you all over again" should be "i might end up falling for her all over again"
3. "that you still like me?" should be "that you still like her?"
I was going to mention this, unless there was a development off screen where he started going after the teach post graduation, they should be talking about how the guy feels about our FMC.
 
Group Leader
Joined
Jun 21, 2026
Messages
253
I think some translation mistakes turned this into yaoi for a moment, unless there were some overtones I missed out on in the original
thanks for the translation! there were 3 mistakes on page 11:
1. "we getting friendly" should be "us getting friendly"
2. "i might end up falling for you all over again" should be "i might end up falling for her all over again"
3. "that you still like me?" should be "that you still like her?"
I was going to mention this, unless there was a development off screen where he started going after the teach post graduation, they should be talking about how the guy feels about our FMC.
Both yes and no. Japanese is a pro-drop language. Sometimes they drop the objects and subjects in a sentence. Like in this panel:
4.jpg

If I were to translate page 11 one-to-one, it would be something like: "I might end up falling for [the object] again." "Don't you mean to say that you still like [the object]?"

I translated it with Sanae referring to himself in his love for Homura because... He does love Homura too. Haven't you read the prequel?

3.jpg


11.jpg


10.jpg

The mangaka even teases yaoi between the two here:
2.jpg

Ah, but if you want to read it as him referring to Ren on pg11, sure you can. It's just that me and my fujoshi side transcribed it the other way around.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 20, 2018
Messages
3,649
It's so small world.
But I am glad to see they can drink together as friends. Because Kotarou almost doesn't have any friends.

Thanks for translation
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Aug 27, 2025
Messages
470
Both yes and no. Japanese is a pro-drop language. Sometimes they drop the objects and subjects in a sentence. Like in this panel:
View attachment 71105

If I were to translate page 11 one-to-one, it would be something like: "I might end up falling for [the object] again." "Don't you mean to say that you still like [the object]?"

I translated it with Sanae referring to himself in his love for Homura because... He does love Homura too. Haven't you read the prequel?

View attachment 71108


View attachment 71114


View attachment 71117

The mangaka even teases yaoi between the two here:
View attachment 71120

Ah, but if you want to read it as him referring to Ren on pg11, sure you can. It's just that me and my fujoshi side transcribed it the other way around.
yes, japanese omits pronouns so sometimes it's hard to say. but we know sanae liked hasumi. as someone who read the prequel manga as well, i never saw anything that actually spoke to romantic feelings. it seems quite obvious to me they were talking about hasumi since that was that the conversation topic had been about, and what the readers know to be factually given information. you're the one translating so ultimately your decision goes, but you're definitely reaching by saying sanae also had an actual romantic crush on homura and that they were talking about him.

even from conversational context, why would sanae ask homura if he's ok with getting close to homura if they were talking about hasumi wanting to stay in contact with sanae right beforehand? i feel like you're intentionally ignoring things to have your fujoshi subromance that's never actually been confirmed (or in my opinion actually hinted at).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top