Recent content by Oeconomist

Fourteen laps on a three-kilometer track is nearly two standard marathons.

Okay, so you just ducked the evidence that you have utterly fabricated your claims of scientific accomplishment. Now, I didn't make an issue here of my status as an academic; you made it an issue after stalking me to discover who I were. And I didn't make an issue of your alleged...

That isn't all that you said, and isn't what was refuted by the links that I provided. You claimed Now, that's wrong either way, but the question was of whether you were making an honest-though-foolish error extrapolating from what is observed in computer and information science. That...

Predictable, but very well handled.

So, as I've said, some Elsevier journals are crap; and it occurred to me that I didn't know whether any Elsevier journals of information science were not crap; in which case you might here be making an honest error of extrapolation. But I am capable of checking standard metrics for information...

The desire to be cruel as such always comes from a felt sense of weakness, and hence your attempts to find a way to hurt me; but the attempts themselves are impotent, so a vicious circle results, with you escalating. Not only are you just throwing-out nothing but insults, but you're so...

I'm sure that it is. It's been a while. People who don't try don't find me. Nope. Elsevier publishes a range of journals, some of which are first rate and some of which are crap. I go by standard metrics in deciding to which journals I submit. That spreadsheet orders journals by the...

No, I didn't. But you'll just keep insisting. In response to You've obsessively tracked down as much information as you can about me, including my home address. Nope, I don't submit to third-rate journals. And, when I begin submitting articles, I have a lower rejection rate for each than is...

Nope. I'm saying that I don't worry about anything that you might do in what you regard as I wouldn't bother to throw articles (which, unpublished, would obviously not be publications) at third-rate journals. In toto all that you offer here are insults and another admission of sadism...

And so a tiny bit more progress. Yes it was, because I only discovered the skipping exactly from his declaration that the skipt chapters were found elsewhere, and my original assumption in the explanation of the skipping was that he were telling the truth. Then you were foolish for simply...

No, again you are being illogical. I didn't assume that he skipt to be a dick. I recognized that he was a dick because he put the explanation that chapters were missing after people had read the translation. I already recognized that he was a dick before I read that he was in GDS. And, as...

No, I understood that chapters had been skipt, and I understood that readers coming (as would most) from the Updates page would be misled because the uploader had not prefaced the translation with an explanation, but postponed that explanation until after the damage was done. No, and this...

No, I had no evident reason to do so. I had reason to explain that the author had not rushed the ending. No, you're just committed to a theory of my motives that you cannot actually back-up, but just keep reiterating. I don't think that you are better at understanding other people than you...

Except that I didn't simply agree with that. I agreed that the scanlator had pulled a dick move, and I've already explained how he could have posted just a scanlation of chapter 42 without it being a dick move. Don't pseudo-quote me. And now you're back to treating your conjectures as to my...

Okay, so a long string of insults, and again a refusal to address what I actually wrote as opposed to what you guessed that I'd intended. Once again, I'm expected to discern some intention not captured by what you've actually written. * shrug * No, that's not to the point. You drew an absurd...