Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2023
- Messages
- 64
Well it was a bad idea to start reading this yesterday, huh?
I know, I'm explicitly asking about the "discussion" forum threads on MangaDex attached to these chapters and not the chapters themselves.why DMCA was decision to delete chapters
320 mangas were deleted chapters, search reddit information
Thanks for telling me where to start, however I'm saying the way it explained the demon's nature is contradicting. It's either "all demons bad" or "most demons bad but there are exceptions". The show picks (Frieren and the general understanding of that world) and says the first one as the correct answer, however the actions and dialogue given by the demon's themselves, show that the second answer makes more sense. That's why I said it's a contradiction. I don't know if the author was trying to blur the line of which archetype they belong to, but as far as I can tell, it's obvious standout inconstancy.I think the anime explained demon's nature well enough, and they skipped almost nothing from the manga. The anime ended on chapter 60, so you can read from chapter 61 to get ahead of the anime.
How can this happened there is no chapter
They're working on it.Can't they just at least re-upload the chapters but with no content? I can't remember where I left it at![]()
What action did a demon take that made you think some of them were good?Thanks for telling me where to start, however I'm saying the way it explained the demon's nature is contradicting. It's either "all demons bad" or "most demons bad but there are exceptions". The show picks (Frieren and the general understanding of that world) and says the first one as the correct answer, however the actions and dialogue given by the demon's themselves, show that the second answer makes more sense. That's why I said it's a contradiction. I don't know if the author was trying to blur the line of which archetype they belong to, but as far as I can tell, it's obvious standout inconstancy.
As much as they used to write of grey areas, the law has always been against them.I wish MangaDex could put up a more decent fight to defend its position.
The author and artist sold exclusive licenses. Most creators are not in a position to sell more limited licenses, nor do most of them want to be tied-up in negotiations, nor to pay more fees to agencies.I would be absolutely up to paying a subscription to MangaDex too if that many could find its way to both the mangakas (through proper payment of the rights)
Eh, that's too broad a claim. But certainly some bootlegged scanlations are better than some licensed translations.all translation done by “professionals” (e.g. Viz) are absolute crap because they care very little about the works they translate
Putting this in spoilers since it's from Chapter 83. Also I haven't gotten past the goddess monument arc so apologies if what I'm about to say has already been covered.What action did a demon take that made you think some of them were good?
I, as well, have bought many titles officially on Kindle and such because I saw them first at sites like this where I could preview them. Frieren is one of them.Well, I discovered this series via MangaDex, and have bought every volume of the licensed translation as they have been released, and licensed copies of the anime adaptation. Had the bootlegged scanlations not been available, I'd have been one fewer customer.
"this species of psychopathic serial liars claims that they're good, therefore at least some of them must be good."Thanks for telling me where to start, however I'm saying the way it explained the demon's nature is contradicting. It's either "all demons bad" or "most demons bad but there are exceptions". The show picks (Frieren and the general understanding of that world) and says the first one as the correct answer, however the actions and dialogue given by the demon's themselves, show that the second answer makes more sense. That's why I said it's a contradiction. I don't know if the author was trying to blur the line of which archetype they belong to, but as far as I can tell, it's obvious standout inconstancy.
"this species of psychopathic serial liars claims that they're good, therefore at least some of them must be good."
Frieren's demons are my favorite villain species in any form of media because they so consistently trick the lowest of humanity into exposing themselves.
No, your failure to distinguish the meaning of a word from the intent behind the speaker of the word isn't inconsistent worldbuilding.