Saike Mata Shite mo - Vol. 11 Ch. 100 - Raison D'etre

[Oeconomist]

He wasn't pausing in his declaration, he was saying it as he was doing it, but the second ball hit him in the back of the head first, how difficult is that to understand? Also, reminder that Calim isn't just swinging the chains, he's moving them as if with telekinesis.

I'm not going to review and respond after five years. How difficult is that to understand?

(Maybe if this series hadn't
turned into a steaming pile defended by perverts, review would be a pleasure.)

 

[theblasblas]

I'm not going to review and respond after five years. How difficult is that to understand?

(Maybe if this series hadn't
turned into a steaming pile defended by perverts, review would be a pleasure.)

You still responded though. Really goes to show how you don't know what you're talking about.

 

[Oeconomist]

You still responded though. Really goes to show how you don't know what you're talking about.

I said "review and respond", not "review or respond" nor baldly "respond", weasel.

After five years, it's quite reasonable to have forgot both the details of the story and the details of the argument. And, since the story sucks and the argument was constrained by the bullshit rules that used to prevail on MangaDex, it's quite reasonable not to want to review either just to bat-around a twerp.

 

[theblasblas]

I said "review and respond", not "review or respond" nor baldly "respond", weasel.

After five years, it's quite reasonable to have forgot both the details of the story and the details of the argument. And, since the story sucks and the argument was constrained by the bullshit rules that used to prevail on MangaDex, it's quite reasonable not to want to review either just to bat-around a twerp.

You're the one trying to weasel yourself out of your mistake, lmao. Whatever, it's clear from your responses back there that you have really bad reading comprehension, so it makes sense that you're like this. So go on, shoo~

 

[Oeconomist]

You're the one trying to weasel yourself out of your mistake, lmao. Whatever, it's clear from your responses back there that you have really bad reading comprehension, so it makes sense that you're like this. So go on, shoo~

Nope. You offered a weaselly misreading of what I'd said, and I've offered a perfectly good reason for not revisiting an extended argument from five years ago. Find someone else to perv on.

 

[theblasblas]

Nope. You offered a weaselly misreading of what I'd said, and I've offered a perfectly good reason for not revisiting an extended argument from five years ago. Find someone else to perv on.

Sure, sure. I never even asked you to revisit anything so who knows what the hell you're even going on about. Go crawl back into whatever hole you got squeezed out of.

 

[Oeconomist]

Sure, sure. I never even asked you to revisit anything so who knows what the hell you're even going on about. Go crawl back into whatever hole you got squeezed out of.

You tried to draw me back into the argument or to acquiesce. To properly do either, I'd have to review it.

Your resort to trolling should be sufficiently indicative for anyone wishing to assess the matter without diving more deeply into the argument. And any come-back that you might offer now would just be more trolling.

 

[theblasblas]

You tried to draw me back into the argument or to acquiesce. To properly do either, I'd have to review it.

Your resort to trolling should be sufficiently indicative for anyone wishing to assess the matter without diving more deeply into the argument. And any come-back that you might offer now would just be more trolling.

Honestly, I thought you were trolling at first with how stupid your responses were, but if you're accusing me of trolling then it just shows that you truly do believe all the idiotic nonsense you've been spouting. Which is just sad.

I wasn't inviting you into a discussion, I was just chiming in my agreement about how idiotic and inane your criticism of this particular aspect of the story is. Anyone with the smallest hint of rational thinking would realize that Hizu was momentarily knocked out when he was hit in the back of the head, and that's why he wasn't able to touch the chain or activate his ability. If he hadn't been hit in the back of the head, he'd have caught the chain so his actions made sense.

It's clear that in these 5 years you haven't grown as a person, so how about you go back to school. It's never too late to learn even though you're probably a decrepit old man.

 

[Oeconomist]

Honestly, I thought you were trolling at first with how stupid your responses were, but if you're accusing me of trolling then it just shows that you truly do believe all the idiotic nonsense you've been spouting. Which is just sad.

I wasn't inviting you into a discussion, I was just chiming in my agreement about how idiotic and inane your criticism of this particular aspect of the story is. Anyone with the smallest hint of rational thinking would realize that Hizu was momentarily knocked out when he was hit in the back of the head, and that's why he wasn't able to touch the chain or activate his ability. If he hadn't been hit in the back of the head, he'd have caught the chain so his actions made sense.

It's clear that in these 5 years you haven't grown as a person, so how about you go back to school. It's never too late to learn even though you're probably a decrepit old man.

Pure, frustrated trolling.

You tagged me to draw me, but it hasn't worked-out for you, so you switched to trolling; yet that hasn't worked-out for you either.

 

[theblasblas]

Pure, frustrated trolling.

You tagged me to draw me, but it hasn't worked-out for you, so you switched to trolling; yet that hasn't worked-out for you either.

I quoted your stupid comment to indicate what parts of it I disagreed with. You were the one who chose to reply back.

Honestly, is this all you can do? Blather on about inane nonsense? You said you weren't interested in talking to me yet you keep replying.

 

[Oeconomist]

I quoted your stupid comment to indicate what parts of it I disagreed with.

Quoting without tagging is trivial:

I quoted your stupid comment to indicate what parts of it I disagreed with.

Honestly, is this all you can do?

A perverse comment from a troll.

You said you weren't interested in talking to me

No, I didn't, you lying troll. I said that I wasn't willing to continue the argument that you tried to stir-up after five years, because I'd have to review the chapter and the previous discussion. But I don't have to engage in such review to bat-around a troll.

Trolling still isn't working-out for you. But it is all that you can do.

 

[theblasblas]

Quoting without tagging is trivial:



A perverse comment from a troll.

No, I didn't, you lying troll. I said that I wasn't willing to continue the argument that you tried to stir-up after five years, because I'd have to review the chapter and the previous discussion. But I don't have to engage in such review to bat-around a troll.

Trolling still isn't working-out for you. But it is all that you can do.

Why should I bother with that when the reply button is right there? You're not worth even the trivial effort.

I've already explained to you all the reasons why you're wrong. Since you evidently don't want to engage in a discussion, or rather since you don't have the intelligence and are clearly incapable of holding a discussion, just crawl back into your hole.

 

[Oeconomist]

Why should I bother with that when the reply button is right there? You're not worth even the trivial effort.

You say that even as you continue your effort to troll.

Since you evidently don't want to engage in a discussion,

I don't want to engage in a review of the argument necessary for discussion of that argument.

since you don't have the intelligence and are clearly incapable of holding a discussion,

An illogical, trolling response to my refusal to expend the effort of review for a discussion of a matter that you said wasn't worth even far less effort on your part.

just crawl back into your hole.

Just stop trolling, and I'll stop slapping you for trolling.

Of course, ceasing to troll would take a real effort on your part.

 

[theblasblas]

You say that even as you continue your effort to troll.

I don't want to engage in a review of the argument necessary for discussion of that argument.

An illogical, trolling response to my refusal to expend the effort of review for a discussion of a matter that you said wasn't worth even far less effort on your part.

Just stop trolling, and I'll stop slapping you for trolling.

Of course, ceasing to troll would take a real effort on your part.

Dude, it's very clear that you're the one trolling here. All I've done is explain my stance, and all you've done is waffle on about inane off-topic nonsense. I wasn't inviting you into a discussion, but since you ARE responding, the least you could do is make some frigging sense. But it's very clear you are either unwilling or incapable of that.

 

[Oeconomist]

Dude, it's very clear that you're the one trolling here.

Nope. You could just have accepted that expecting me to rejoin an argument after five years was inane, but instead you started trolling.

All I've done is explain my stance,

No, you lying troll. You explained your stance in your first comment, but with your second you began trolling.

all you've done is waffle on about inane off-topic nonsense

I've just responded directly to your trollish claims. You took us off the original topic, and you have kept-up the trolling.

I wasn't inviting you into a discussion

You were, and would have been even if (as you now pretend) your tagging was just laziness.

you ARE responding

If you find yourself unhappy with my responses to your trolling, then stop trolling.

the least you could do is make some frigging sense

If my responses made no sense, then you would have had no trouble ignoring them.

it's very clear you are either unwilling or incapable of that.

Another trolling insult.

Again: Trolling is all that you can do; you lack the self-control to cut your losses and quit.

 

[theblasblas]

Nope. You could just have accepted that expecting me to rejoin an argument after five years was inane, but instead you started trolling.

No, you lying troll. You explained your stance in your first comment, but with your second you began trolling.

I've just responded directly to your trollish claims. You took us off the original topic, and you have kept-up the trolling.

You were, and would have been even if (as you now pretend) your tagging was just laziness.

If you find yourself unhappy with my responses to your trolling, then stop trolling.

If my responses made no sense, then you would have had no trouble ignoring them.

Another trolling insult.

Again: Trolling is all that you can do; you lack the self-control to cut your losses and quit.

Your reply to my first comment explaining my stance was already off topic, so no, YOU took us off topic. I then proceeded to explain why your reply was nonsense.

Again, I NEVER asked you to rejoin the discussion, you did that on your own. I've lost nothing in this exchange. If that's how you view this conversation then it's clear that you're the one losing something. Really, from what I can tell you clearly don't even enjoy manga so I don't know why you're still here on this website.

 

[Oeconomist]

Your reply to my first comment explaining my stance was already off topic

Explaining why one won't proceed with a discussion at hand is not off-topic.

I then proceeded to explain why your reply was nonsense.

No, then you lied trollishly. And my explaining that lie as such was thus on-topic.

Again, I NEVER asked you to rejoin the discussion,

Again: You tagged me. Even if you had done so from laziness, it still constitutes an attempt to draw me back into discussion.

I've lost nothing in this exchange.

The reason that you keep commenting, even after claiming that you didn't think the discussion worth much effort, is that you rightly feel that you're being made to look like a fool, but don't see that you're mostly doing it to yourself.

it's clear that you're the one losing something.

I may be mistaken in thinking that I'm losing nothing; but, in any case, it's not clear that I'm losing anything. You're trying to use a forceful word in place of a rational argument.

from what I can tell you clearly don't even enjoy manga

That is the very most stupid thing that you've so far said in this thread. It's at least not trolling, but it's remarkably stupid.

 

[theblasblas]

Explaining why one won't proceed with a discussion at hand is not off-topic.

No, then you lied trollishly. And my explaining that lie as such was thus on-topic.

Again: You tagged me. Even if you had done so from laziness, it still constitutes an attempt to draw me back into discussion.

The reason that you keep commenting, even after claiming that you didn't think the discussion worth much effort, is that you rightly feel that you're being made to look like a fool, but don't see that you're mostly doing it to yourself.

I may be mistaken in thinking that I'm losing nothing; but, in any case, it's not clear that I'm losing anything. You're trying to use a forceful word in place of a rational argument.

That is the very most stupid thing that you've so far said in this thread. It's at least not trolling, but it's remarkably stupid.

Nope, it was very off topic, it doesn't really add anything to the discussion about the manga. It's like an idiot commenting just to say "Dropping this". If you didn't want to join the discussion you could've just not replied. Would've really saved yourself the trouble since you're very clearly not enjoying this.

I quoted you, which is a different thing, and is not an invitation to a discussion. Even if that caused the system to give you a notification, it doesn't really change anything. You could've just ignored the notification.

This discussion still isn't expending any effort. If anything, it's amusing seeing all the ways you try to weasel yourself out of the stupid shit you said. Though you ARE starting to get repetitive. 🥱

 

[Oeconomist]

it was very off topic

Meta-topics are always on-topic. Indeed, when you accuse me of being off-topic, you are yourself engaged in meta-topical discussion. And the problem is not that you are off-topic, but that you are both wrong and hypocritical.

it doesn't really add anything to the discussion about the manga

It explained why the discussion would not continue.

It's like an idiot commenting just to say "Dropping this".

No, it's like a non-idiot explaining why a class of people (perhaps comprising all readers) should drop a manga.

If you didn't want to join the discussion you could've just not replied. Would've really saved yourself the trouble since you're very clearly not enjoying this.

More hypocrisy. The person plainly not enjoying this discussion is you

I quoted you, which is a different thing,

As I've repeatedly noted, you didn't just quote me; you tagged me.

You could've just ignored the notification.

Indeed, I could also have ignored any other attempt (such as a private message) by you to draw me into discussion. But we're not arguing whether I was forced; I'm just not letting you escape from the point that you tried to draw me back into a long-dormant argument.

This discussion still isn't expending any effort.

It's taking far more effort from you than would have been required to quote me without tagging me, and you said that the latter effort was too much for you.

it's amusing seeing all the ways you try to weasel yourself out of the stupid shit you said.

The only weaseling here has been from you. And, whereas I can point to your lying about what I've said, you can only resort to untestable theories about my motives when you make your accusations.

Anyway, you've shifted from pretty bald trolling to adolescent sophistry, so I guess that you finally understand that the former wasn't working for you; the latter won't work either.