Akuyaku Reijou no Ani ni Tensei Shimashita - Vol. 7 Ch. 37

[MangaDex]

 

[asphyxiav2]

Finally a raw update, I still have fever until now🫠 I hope you enjoyed today's chapter despite lack of Dianium.

 

[mgRdr]

Let me make my opinion about the roaylty clear:

 

[PhantomXTrinity]

There's not enough Diana in this chapter, life ruined

 

[Slingerman]

Ransom was indeed a common punishment in situations like these.

This chapter highlights that struggles between the nobles and crown are also a thing, besides peasant relations. I really appreciate that the author thought of these things, medieval social order is usually glossed over in isekai. But this isn't a typical power fantasy.

Thanks for the translation, looks good!

 

[Baelgun]

Let me make my opinion about the roaylty clear:

Same for me i'll never fucking survive being isekaied in a fantasy world i'd start killing nobility left and right, and let's not even talk about organized religion.

 

[asphyxiav2]

Ransom was indeed a common punishment in situations like these.

This chapter highlights that struggles between the nobles and crown are also a thing, besides peasant relations. I really appreciate that the author thought of these things, medieval social order is usually glossed over in isekai. But this isn't a typical power fantasy.

Thanks for the translation, looks good!

Thank you, I'm really bothered how the reincarnated person in the game's fmc kinda got glossed over but I guess we'll meet her again soon when the academy arc starts.

 

[asphyxiav2]

There's not enough Diana in this chapter, life ruined

Ify

 

[Sir_AL]

Most people forget that "intent" generally isn't much of a factor when deciding if someone committed a crime. It's more for after they are convicted to decide the level of punishment.

So just because you didn't intend to commit treason doesn't mean you didn't commit it. But if you didn't intend to commit treason you are less likely to get executed for it.

 

[pandatime]

ya know Cain father said it too but i was just tinking Cain like did you forget how many times you did bad to the prince?
like honestly you lucky you hasnt been trialed for Treason lmao

 

[FrostFire]

Most people forget that "intent" generally isn't much of a factor when deciding if someone committed a crime. It's more for after they are convicted to decide the level of punishment.

So just because you didn't intend to commit treason doesn't mean you didn't commit it. But if you didn't intend to commit treason you are less likely to get executed for it.

But what of murder and manslaughter, I might be wrong but you either get convicted for murder or manslaughter, murder requires intent while manslaughter doesn't; intent does matter if it's baked into the law or is a prerequisite to conviction

 

[ZeroNihilum]

So he gets assigned into the mage corps.

What? Criminal is evolving!

Congratulations! Your Criminal evolved into War Criminal!

 

[Velmoria]

Let me make my opinion about the roaylty clear:

 

[asphyxiav2]

So he gets assigned into the mage corps.

What? Criminal is evolving!

Congratulations! Your Criminal evolved into War Criminal!

With this happening, it's more likely that he'll get disowned by his family and that way his grandfather won't be able to control his projects as a member of mage corps and he could still get the title of Margrave that he's aiming if he did great. Cain is just that considerable.

 

[varezenem]

Most people forget that "intent" generally isn't much of a factor when deciding if someone committed a crime. It's more for after they are convicted to decide the level of punishment.

So just because you didn't intend to commit treason doesn't mean you didn't commit it. But if you didn't intend to commit treason you are less likely to get executed for it.

Whether intent matters depends on the legal system and the specific crime. In English common law, mens rea(the "guilty mind") is a core component in determining criminal liability. Most serious crimes require both actus reus (a guilty act) and mens rea to secure a conviction. However, not knowing that an action is illegal (ignorance of the law) generally isn't a valid defense. Now, both can be used to evaluate the sentence.

For the anti-monarchist you guys are overestimating democracy. While I'm a classical liberal and not a monarchist there are advantages to a monarchy. Mostly that a monarchy the monarch and his family benefit more from long-term stability and success of the country. This creates a natural incentive for long-term planning. In contrast, democracies often prioritize short-term gains, driven by election cycles and shifting public opinion.

 

[lenovoaxioo]

thanks for always making dia compilation

 

[jannick1010]

go to sleep, youve been working fir 6 hours now

 

[JaxunHero]

Jailbird
Rest

 

[Salfaro]

I feel like the conversation was supposed to be a bit more comforting from his dad, but it basically went:

Cain: "Aren't those punishments kind of insane?"
Dad: "Were you charged with treason for your incident with the prince?"
Cain: "No, I guess not, that makes more sense, that's a relie--"
Dad: "Well let me be clear, the law absolutely says you could have been charged for treason. It's only the whims of the royal family that have kept your head on your shoulders. Don't forget that. Thankfully, the (current) monarchs are pretty nice. But yeah you weren't charged with treason. That time."

 

[InsaneAwesomeTony]

Rest up and recover, very competent jailbird!
Thanks for the chapter 🙏🏼❤️