Group Leader
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2023
- Messages
- 737
Konno is 21 in this mangaHe-Man, you do know the manga you translated is based of a mangaka with assault and rape in it? And she's also underage. Don't lecture me on what I like in fiction.
Konno is 21 in this mangaHe-Man, you do know the manga you translated is based of a mangaka with assault and rape in it? And she's also underage. Don't lecture me on what I like in fiction.
Yet still in high school?
The manga itself tells you that she attends correspondence school and goes in person to take the exams. If a 40-year-old person decides to finish their studies using the same method, does that make them a minor?Yet still in high school?
You define the flaw of this manga then, why would a women outside of the threshold do this? Never. It's fiction.The manga itself tells you that she attends correspondence school and goes in person to take the exams. If a 40-year-old person decides to finish their studies using the same method, does that make them a minor?
Explain the problem. Report it to the police if it's a problem if you want to adhomhomimem.It's strange that even though I never mentioned lolis, everyone talks about them... I just said it's weird and disgusting that there are adults with sexual fantasies about fictional children.
The manga itself says that she had to drop out of school while recovering from the abuse she suffered at the hands of her mother, and that she returned to her studies to finish them when she was 18. What are you getting at? In the real world, correspondence schools exist; they're called night schools.You define the flaw of this manga then, why would a women outside the threshold do this? Never. It's fiction.
I never said anything about Lolis, I only said that it's strange that there are adults sexually fantasizing about a fictional children.Regardless, I was just staying don't educate me translator-san when lolicon is a part of anime and manga.
You also know this manga is leading to incest? Even regardless of that I made a mistake on her age I understand but it's still fiction. It doesn't matter.The manga itself says that she had to drop out of school while recovering from the abuse she suffered at the hands of her mother, and that she returned to her studies to finish them when she was 18. What are you getting at? In the real world, correspondence schools exist; they're called night schools.
I never said anything about Lolis, I only said that it's strange that there are adults sexually fantasizing about a fictional children.
Don't say "It doesn't matter." You came here to say "She's underage," and when I told you you were wrong, you changed the subject. I'll bet you don't read the manga, because that's basic information.Even regardless of that I made a mistake on her age I understand but it's still fiction. It doesn't matter.
Likening lolis in anime is fine, the main point with the translator that her overstepped what he said. This manga in a subjunctive form is really "I can fix her". and I understand that well.Don't say "It doesn't matter." You came here to say "She's underage," and when I told you you were wrong, you changed the subject. I'll bet you don't read the manga, because that's basic information.
Again, I never said anything about Lolis, I said fictional minors.Likening lolis in anime is fine.
But you didn't remember Konno's age and reason for attending school exams even if she's 21?the main point with the translator that her overstepped what he said. This manga in a subjunctive form is really "I can fix her". and I understand that well.
Is the term loli offensive? Should I say fictional minors?Again, I never said anything about Lolis, I said fictional minors.
But you didn't remember Konno's age and reason for attending school exams even if she's 21?
I don't know, you guys keep talking about Lolis when I say fictional children, if they're the same thing to you... Perhaps that explains why they are so angry about itIs the term loli offensive? Should I say fictional minors?
I don't know, you guys keep talking about Lolis when I say fictional children, if they're the same thing to you... Perhaps that explains why they are so angry about it
Did you know about the late Kentaro Miura (of Berserk fame) pro CP political manga, in defense of the creation, commercialization, ownership, and the gooning of and to fictional underage characters? that very thing you mentioned in the credits?But the hamburgers are good
only 4 years! damnnn. -quietly deletes cougar searches in shame-Unfortunately paedophilia is a genetic thing, just like being straight or gay is a genetic thing. It's not a choice that is made, or anything that can be 'cured'; however, it is something that one must talk to a professional about regarding ways to manage and cope with it because obviously it's not okay to have sexual relations with people that can't yet fully make decisions for themselves (or try to have relations like that), while you can make those decisions. It is why I, who is ~30 years old, am not attracted to people who are younger than 26. There's just too much of a difference. Like how reading romcoms about highschool kids sometimes just annoys me (most other times it's just sweetly nostalgic).
My proff was really outspoken on anti-paedophilia rhetoric because most paedophiles are harmless. Sometimes though, they're also psychopaths which enables them to do horrible things that fill me with cold fury and bloodlust. Those are the people we should be focusing on, which are not the same as the people that consume loli porn. Trump, Epstein, Maxwell, etc., are all psychopathic paedophiles and should be imprisoned or.
I don't know, there's something morally, socially, and ethically wrong with feeling attraction to a child, whether fictional or not."I don't know to you but when I say frictional children"... They're not real. I'm sorry but this is a issue that doesn't matter.