Search results

“I can’t believe something like that happened” Ugh... I hope I’m not interpreting this incorrectly...

I hate how the bubbles change design constantly without reflecting who’s speaking them... like... it’s confusing...

Sounds sick! I love drama CDs because it gives me a voice that I use for characters as I continue to read manga. So I’d definitely like to see this!

@Nicromatic Yeah, you’re right... but that was still rather inappropriate for someone whom you’ve been get along with for some time. And she knows he was recently rejected, too... @Askorti Yes I agree, and also screw the big boob lady... fucking leave him alone if you rejected him...

dang... just sad...

Umm... is Lucifer a “he” or was that mistranslated? Cause by the looks at it Lucifer looks like a “she” and we all know where that’s going...

I remember telling @Plykiya about this and suggested an option to disable missing chapters tracking in titles that are known to follow weird formats. Though it was never submitted as a separate suggestion, so yes I’d like this. Hope we get it.

Well, uhh, that’s just you... also, im sure I’m not the only one, but at least I already have my program written to take in the format the api currently gives. I’m too lazy to change that... and you could easily write a loop to change the structure for your benefit.

Ok, why the fuck does mal say this has 155 chapters?!

Is it just me or do their ears really stand out?

Thank you for your sacrifice, Ghoul-san...

Fucking love guru

I just want to say that Dacascos is freaking awesome. That was a lot of text... very nice that they translated all of it. Must have been a lot of work. Thank you, guys!

Hello, reader! Do you think this might not be a good read? Well, you’re wrong! This is lovely and i recommend you continue reading. You won’t regret it!

Dang... i liked this way more than I thought I would! Really enjoyed it! Definitely recommend it!

The text was purposely made red... why?

Why was I bamboozled like this...

@Oeconomist have you seen 9anime’s search function? It does exactly what you’re proposing. Now that I kind of have a small visual, I do kind of prefer the exact match results only... And after thinking about it, exact results are better in my opinion... but your way works too.

@Oeconomist I’m not against your idea, but wouldn’t that require an extra query in their side? Results for a exact match and another result for a “contains” search? Wouldn’t it be easier just going with an exact match only?

@TSP page 15. bubble in top left corner is missing a word (I think) @knecht she doesn’t. She makes the horoscopes!