Search results

pretty sure the pages are out of order on this one

I think part of it is that Tia's perspective wasn't lined up with the outside perspective. So any time passage Tia talked about wasn't necessarily the amount of time we had seen pass outside.

If you look carefully in this chapter, you notice she's sort of gathering up a giant ball of webs all throughout the chapter. It looks like she only leaves webs around the art room and collects the rest. So the webs on her arms are probably webs she spun earlier and collected, and by the end of...

It's not unreasonable for her to want to disappear. She was a public figure yes, but that's because she was a famous artist. it's pretty clear her public life was not public. But even if it was, people have the right to privacy. If she stops doing her art and wants to leave the world stage...

I do not remember. It might've been when the scientist girl showed up. But he was saying how he wasn't too sure 'spirits' were real and such. I'm not saying this girl's theory is the same as his. Just his "Are the spirits even real in the first place" theory is coming into play.

Well as she just explained in her story, she pretty much has zero allegiance to any country.

I had forgotten about this, I was gonna say maybe he held back for Toyoda's sake, but this is way better and has some foundations already.

So the theory about spirits the MC brought up way earlier is coming into play now.

We look at it as a horror thing because vampires aren't real. Vampires have been known to exist in their world for years. They have already been accepted as "Not monsters" in their society. Perfect example "Normal people wouldn't' choose to go to a school with them". So while people are still...

Should've waited till next week before reading...now I really want to see the next chapter.

Oh there is for sure a desire to 'push boundries' from artist. What I mean with my post though is that, because the audience is older and more aware, the artist try to do things more organically instead of forcing it. (Like Chinese comics where the MC kills everyone that looks at them wrong) So...

Separated post again. I do know that this trend is a lot less with the seinen demographic, but I don't read Jojo so I don't know exactly what you're talking about. However there is less of a trend to try to be 'edgy' when they're seinen as well, and when they are it tends ot be more organic...

It's irrelevant that you were not talking to me. Because the thing that makes you an idiot you just fell back in to. You're being racist and lumping this with a "Asians love beating their kid" And that's simply not true. There are of course people that do. But there are plenty that don't. Also...

intentionally separating this from the other post. But yes this is a 'horrible chapter'. Because what Cain did isn't in character at all. It's a forced situation stimming from Japanese culture. There is a trend that unless a story is 'dark' the MC will not 'kill' or 'punish' people unless it's...

"Oh this is my last reply because you're immature. But I'm still gonna say everything I wanna say after that because really I'm just looking for a way out so I resort to the lame excuse of "insults are immature" When in reality being distracted by an insult in an debate just shows you don't have...

You really are an absolute idiot. You need to go back and read like I suggested. Because one, you got my "primary counter argument" completely wrong. You have no idea what I was actually even arguing. You just think you know something but you actually know nothing. If I wanted to persist in...

Right now I'm trying to prove you are an idiot. see when I posted "there is no point arguing because of their English." YOU responded "That's not true" and you tried to continue. The other parties mentioned dropped it. Some others picked it back up. But you were the only idiot to outright refute...

And this is where you're an idiot. You just want to win. You're not here with any sincerity. let me ask you. What is the point of presenting your case to someone, if they can not understand the nuance of your case? What hope is there of convincing them, or even getting them to partially...

Then you're not actually reading what was said. Here is a post about them responding to you in relation to "all kids" you both thought the other said it but neither of you said it. So if you can't see stuff like that happening your eyes are just closed.

Are you mentally deficient? For the at least THIRD time. We are not talking about a misunderstanding of positions. We are talking about a misunderstanding of details and explanations. I will say nothing else in this post because until you understand that you are not worth talking to. And it...