Search results

So, you've read what I quoted and yet didn't address it at all,funny. You've once again missed my point or completely ignored it, whatever this Gerard Casey may say it's clearly beside the point nor did I deny it was possible since it doesn't affect my argument at all.

How long will this be cooking? I'm smelling something burnt.

Have you read your link? "Jean-Jacques Rousseau contends that in a contract of self-enslavement, there is no mutuality. The slave loses all. The contract negates his interests and his rights. It is entirely to his disadvantage. Since the slave loses his status as a moral agent once the slave...

Sure it does, tell me though what makes a slave? You probably can't say snice you don't explain yourself so I will do it myself by giving an example. Let's say I dominated you by the use of threats and violence etc. and it was legal to do so, you then will do as I see fit thus becoming a slave...

I've said 'as long as he remains a slave' when he disobeys or act against his owner, he is no longer a slave. One must differentiate between a 'legal' slave and a mental slave, the first can try to be free or die trying or turn into the latter in which he loses his will completely. Spartacus is...

Well yes, a slave is someone without a will nor a judgment of his own he can not disgree or act contrary to his owner's will. He could have his own judgment and moral values but as long as he remains a slave, he would not be able to apply them so without the ability to act upon them they are...

I think a much more valid criticism is that by making the character a slave the writer made her very dull and lackluster instead of writing a character that has her own judgement and moral values, then we would have a person who doesn't align completely with the protagonist yet still have some...

my dude, I think there was a problem with comments on this site 2 years ago.