Search results

@criver Guess we'll have to wait a month to see if Kimberly is as one-dimensional as she seems in the only chapter she have appeared in so far.

@criver Except it's not MC who ends up looking best, but MC's friend Kate. It is no wonder: from what we can see about this world's noble society until this chapter, nobles in general do one-dimensionally look down on commoners (and lower-status nobles, for that matter), so is it really a...

@criver What are those negative connotations, though?

@criver Political style that focuses on the issues relevant to various groups defined by a wide variety of shared personal characteristics, leaking into a manga about various groups defined by a wide variety of shared personal characteristics? Inconceivable!

@ShinGetsu That description fits anti-SJW crowd way better, from what I've seen. Then again, that you say "to be reasoned with" is such a loaded wording. It implies that you assume from the start that whenever your conclusions about anything differ from those of so-called "SJWs", yours...

Not again.

For some reason cyrillics in sound effects make it seem funnier.

@Nep Yeah, but still. @cyclopropene Oh, that makes more sense.

"At least" eight hours a day? The modern society only had a chance to develop the way it did when work was reduced to at most eight hours a day, and even that is no longer justified. What is the author smoking?

@BaToolo Thanks for translating this! I've got a correction, though. The old name for Japan isn't "Wakaku", it's "Wakoku" — and indeed, this is what the raws say in the furigana: わこく.

And so, after 43 chapters, the premise of our MC having been a livestreamer finally has a chance to be used as an actual plot point!.. …and then doesn't. *sigh* This is not quite Hayato no Gotoku and Tonikaku Cawaii tier plot teasing, but still.

4. Praise the Helix

@netkius I'm guessing author inserts his own opinions in MC's mouth and expects everyone agree with it. His other manga's logic is on the same level, after all.

@EnderWin *sigh* The first part of the comment: I do not want and will not correct the same "misinterpretation" over and over again. One time should be enough. Two times definitely is enough. And for "misinterpretations" that are basically making stuff up instead of actually engaging with the...

@Broken25 @Tatsumaikyoku In all fairness, I'm not above some pomposity myself. But both of you are right, these rhetorics won't go anywhere.

@starch12313 No. Not what I said. But then, you already knew that, didn't you? "If something is objectively evil, then how can evil be subjective?" is not the insightful question you are trying to pretend it is. No. But you are going to proceed with the rest of your argument as if I answered...

@starch12313 Cool bait. You do realise neither of your questions is relevant, right? The original thesis I disagreed with was "you cannot be called evil if society you are part doesn't think you are evil", which is false regardless of whether objective evil exists or not. After all, if evil is...

@Lucrecia Well, you clearly already have an answer to that: dogpile everyone who dares to acknowledge that characters in works of fiction that do bad things did bad things. More putting words in other peoples mouthes. Booooriiiing. Come up with better arguments, please. That is factually...

@Chizan And yet you just advised someone who called out a character in story for bad behaviour to stop reading the story, as if acknowledging characters' faults is the same as not liking the story. Curious, isn't it?

@Chizan Is that how you treat fiction you consume? Only read books that contain good things happening to people you agree with, so that you never had to — the horror! — sympathise with a victim of something you consider unjust? Because that approach would explain a lot about the concerning lack...