A Story About a Wife Who Came From the Future to Stop Someone From Committing Suicide - Oneshot

[Trevoga]

This reeks of "twist for the sake of twist"

 

[Dwander1219]

This reeks of "twist for the sake of twist"

Welcome to 90% of hamita stories

 

[Potatoo]

Man...

I miss Italian freeloader Hamita

 

[Eggsburst]

That was depressing

 

[thycondrius]

yeah... this is stupid. 1/10

 

[fsadfsad]

Hamita has been on a tear lately hitting us with some absolute mid 🔥 🔥 🔥

Hamita's stories are a roulette. Guy has a solid distribution of largely mid works with a few bangers and more than a few strange messes. And I mean both comedies and tragedies. But yeah, last bath does feel a bit mid.

 

[feha]

?..

Wait.. She knew he was going to kill himself on this day, because he told her someone prevented him from killing himself on that day, but she couldnt have gone back to prevent him from doing so, without him telling her first..

Wouldn't that be a paradox then, since he should've died, since she couldn't possibly prevent him from doing so ?

Not quite, one of the prevailing theories on time-travel is that if it was at all possible, it would also be entirely impossible to change the past/future. So if someone went back to kill their grandpa, they would inevitably fail because their grandpa wasn't dead originally. And originally they had gone back in time trying to kill their grandpa.

We can move it down to fewer dimensions (yes, this theory is in large part from the idea that time is an actual fourth spatial dimension), You have a 3d-shape. The shape itself (in 2d) changes over z (the third dimension), despite the shape (in 3d) being rigid as z passed. If it at any point actually loops back around you will in 2d see it as 2 isolated islands (and if it touches or connects with itself those islands will touch at that z). But this was always the case at z=0, the "time-travel" (or rather, "3d-travel") did not change anything and create two "3dlines" ("timelines") or anything like that.

Now replace everything with being 3d slices over a fourth dimension "t" instead. At t=0 the time traveler always existed and their actions were part of the four-dimensional shape looping back on itself.


Instead, the only paradox would be if she had gone back in time to encourage him to suicide, making them never meet. That would be equivalent to the portion looping back through the extra dimension intersecting itself in such a way that a discontinuity exists. And they are in fact instead 2 different shapes. In that case they never were the same shape, and it can't be considered as having looped back on itself in the first place (or however you want to explain it).


But while time is tied to spatial dimensions in a spacetime continuum, it's not absolutely certain it's exactly the same as just an additional dimension (which was how it was described above). And some theories treat it instead more as a passage of time, than a movement in space. It's in those theories you get stuff like the sawtooth snap, N-jump (which arguably is just a finite sawtooth snap, though arguably sawtooth snaps must be infinite themselves even if they don't self-recurse and n-jumps don't exist at all), or infinite loops (paradoxes).
Or ("and"? The above 3 concepts aren't mutually exclusive to this) parallel timelines being spawned from thin air branching from an existing one that still continues on - just with the time-traveled matter removed poof out of existence, when they traveled).

 

[feha]

Isn't this a grandfather paradox? Or a self fulfilling prophecy? Anyone not high wanna explain this to me? Lol

Did that in my comment above -^

It's related to the grandfather paradox in concept in that it is an infinite logical loop, yes. The key difference is that this kind of time loop, unlike that one, has no possible origin point without assuming deviations in the loop which make it a sort of temporal chicken or egg scenario.

On the contrary I would say it is the opposite of a grandfather paradox. As the grandfather paradox is based in paradoxically negating its own impetus such that the negation never happened meaning the impetus remains, and so on. While this is instead validating/enabling its own impetus, such that the enabling action remains (and the only question is instead "but how did it enable itself if in some imaginary 'first iteration' where it hadn't enabled itself yet? Like a while loop that forgot to initialize the flag it checks truthy'ness of in the conditional").
His other suggestion is a more accurate descriptor: "a self-fulfilling prophecy".

 

[benshapiro]

Hamita has been on a tear lately hitting us with some absolute mid 🔥 🔥 🔥

Hamidta indeed

 

[silverpetricof]

I...well alright then.

Thanks for the translation.

 

[AcidVlad]

Let's see if there is a fanbox of her being railed now

 

[LW1594]

What is this authors problem???

 

[Cheral]

Huh, what a nice three page oneshot.

 

[ErikTheRed]

Thats the Hamita we all know and love

 

[77BLc9JwJGpLVARkamJx]

mega kek'd

 

[StevenSteve]

the way i just knew it was Hamita without even looking at the author. that damn bastard ;-;

 

[deproxyacct]

yo wtf

 

[THE_REVENGER]

This author always make plot twist, who make me to say WHAT THE FUCK

 

[SunnyD88]

Say April Fools RIGHT NOW

 

[braindeadandy]

this was random