It's three years late and you probably won't read this, but the point isn't who dies. The point is who has the power to choose who lives and who dies. The ten-count, the submission hold - they're a way of saying, "I now have the power to kill you, but I choose not to use it." That's what Musashi meant. If Baki had wanted to kill him, he'd be dead. So in terms of who gets to decide who lives and who dies, Musashi lost that power the second his swords fell out of his hands.@Midoriha yeah I totally understand that.
What I don't understand is why Musashi admitted defeat after getting KO'd the second time in this fight, but not the first time. Or why he admitted defeat to Motobe, who also made him drop his sword, but then just walked away instead of going "ah gg you got me, go ahead and kill me now".
well it has been 3 years so maybe I don't remember the context fully, but my question is less about "Why did Baki win just cuz he KO'd Musashi" and more about "Why did Musashi keep fighting the FIRST time Baki KO'd him, but admitted defeat the SECOND time Baki KO'd him?"It's three years late and you probably won't read this, but the point isn't who dies. The point is who has the power to choose who lives and who dies. The ten-count, the submission hold - they're a way of saying, "I now have the power to kill you, but I choose not to use it." That's what Musashi meant. If Baki had wanted to kill him, he'd be dead. So in terms of who gets to decide who lives and who dies, Musashi lost that power the second his swords fell out of his hands.
His swords grant him an incredible power to take life and to choose who dies. But they can be taken away. Someone who can fight and kill with their body is never without a weapon. Musashi's bond with his swords is strong, and no one is stronger than him when using a sword... but without a sword, Musashi isn't truly Musashi. Baki is Baki even if he's holding nothing. Musashi's aim was to become someone who could decide who lives and who dies like he was wielding a sword even if he empty handed. That way he wouldn't need to deal with the longing of having part of his power be missing if he didn't have a sword.
But to go back to the killing and fighting thing... Baki was trying to demonstrate to him that modern martial arts aren't weaker just because the loser doesn't usually die. The victor who has the power to kill, but chooses not to use it doesn't just have strength of body, but strength of mind and spirit. He always remembers to obey the rules he agreed to. He always controls his impulses to not go too far. He has the power to kill, but he also has the power to choose not kill even though he can.
As Bak said, if Baki moved in for a kill, Baki would get ambushed.well it has been 3 years so maybe I don't remember the context fully, but my question is less about "Why did Baki win just cuz he KO'd Musashi" and more about "Why did Musashi keep fighting the FIRST time Baki KO'd him, but admitted defeat the SECOND time Baki KO'd him?"
I understand the thematic meaning behind Baki's victory. I just don't understand why Musashi would give up at that specific point in time, rather than the previous times he lost.
But I can say that you were wrongI warned all of you this arc would suck. You can't say I didn't warn you...