It's just a tad contrived that both of the thefts happened to be against crippled, frail, helpless people on the the verge of ruin who were somehow more pitiful than actual children. In his own way, he's not wrong, but all the same.. Just return the bear. Just have the child work to repay the old man. It's not a flawless, high-minded philosophy to say "these people were suffering, so the children who made their lives fractionally worse deserved death" as if that solves their problems of being poor and ruined.