Chi.: Chikyuu no Undou ni Tsuite - Vol. 8 Ch. 62
- Thread starter MangaDex
- Start date
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2023
- Messages
- 3
Man this was an excellent read, people be missing out. Looking forward to the anime adaptation. Thanks for translating these btw.
Group Leader
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2018
- Messages
- 7
I wasn't aware that MDex has comments enabled again. Anyhow thanks for taking the time to read Chi!
Aggregator gang
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
- Messages
- 33
That was an amazing manga! Thank you a lot for translating this
Group Leader
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2023
- Messages
- 235
Man! I am really thankful to fellow reader to suggest me this wonderful thought proving work!
Also, thanks for the translation of this time-surpassing work!
Also, thanks for the translation of this time-surpassing work!
Aggregator gang
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2023
- Messages
- 55
Page 32 really makes me depressed 
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2020
- Messages
- 156
Everything has been so meaningful and all, I just wish draka death has more of it, I like her character ;(
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2023
- Messages
- 7
huh? so what did rafael contribute to the theory again? Novak once mentioned that he had to kill rafael, the boy, okgi and badeni but throughout the last two chapters, i dont see anything remarkable about him.
Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2020
- Messages
- 16
He made the first diagram of the theory and solidify the first heretic guy's(i forgot his name) intuition about the theory. His actions led to the theory to eventually being accepted and proven.
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2024
- Messages
- 1
I am confused as to what the text that Cklamovski (the father who worked in the same church as Badeni back in the village) copied from the back of the beggar's heads lead to. I was expecting the text to be found by Albert at the end, but did it pay off way earlier and I just forgot/missed it? It can't have been the book that they took from the inquisitors, as that was Oczy's diary, and the thing with the beggars was prepared by Badeni as a contingency plan way before they were attacked.
EDIT: I went back to check and I was mistaken. The message Badeni wrote in the beggar's heads was indeed the early part of Oczy's diary. Oczy continued working on the book after this but they burned it, and the letter Badeni wrote was the one that father Cklamovski found which prompted him to accept to follow the man that came to see him, so yes, the document that Cklamovski wrote that day was the one that ended in the inquisitor's hands.
EDIT: I went back to check and I was mistaken. The message Badeni wrote in the beggar's heads was indeed the early part of Oczy's diary. Oczy continued working on the book after this but they burned it, and the letter Badeni wrote was the one that father Cklamovski found which prompted him to accept to follow the man that came to see him, so yes, the document that Cklamovski wrote that day was the one that ended in the inquisitor's hands.
Last edited:
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2020
- Messages
- 703
this is what it's all about. absolute banger, notably page 32.
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2024
- Messages
- 4
It's the book in act 3 the book which the girl who obsessed with money burnt
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2019
- Messages
- 409
ABSOLUTE CINEMA
Active member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2019
- Messages
- 433
Such a great story. I don't regret one bit having read it from beginning to end.
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2018
- Messages
- 3,569
Who's the Adult Rafal near the end of the series?
I've seen and read people theories across the internet and comes to three conclusions:
1. Its Alternate timelines where Rafal was raised by a scholar instead of a priest.
Points suggesting it: In ch/ep 1, Rafal was raised by a priest. Yet Adult Rafal mentioned he was raised by a scholar. This could possibly suggest an alternate what if scenario. Implications also suggest that Adult Rafal timeline is the our real one.
Points against it: There's not much evidence to suggest the sudden timeline PoV shift. And also doesn't explain why Rafal letter to Potoski still exist in this timeline. Although the latter can still be explained as constant point in both timelines even if Rafal story itself changed.
2. Rafal survived the execution and made an escape.
Points suggesting it: We never seen Rafal corpse, we only see him tied up, and then the executor light up the torch, and next panel shows a burnt wood without any trace of corpse or even bones. I've read somewhere that Poppy seeds are good for helping people sleep and they aren't venomous at all. The discrepancy of his origin can be be summed as him lying to mask himself away from Novak.
Points against it: It was pretty much shown Novak was there overseeing the execution till the end, which makes the scenario where Rafal able to escape sounds absurd.
3. They are different people.
Points suggesting it: It explain the discrepancy in his origin, and ensure that Rafal did die back then and thus creating no plot hole.
Point against it: It feel too much coincidence that there's exist two Rafal with similar face and interest.
Counter point: Name being similar isn't too odd, but the appearance being the same could be just metaphor by the author. As both Rafal embody the reckless desire in pursuit of knowledge/truth, both embody the same ideal but on the opposite side of a coin.
Regardless which is it I salute the author for leaving one final mystery to close the series. Not only it worked to leave a long lasting discourse for the readers/watchers, but it also it stays true with series' spirit of reaching for the truth. The last page of the manga and also the last scene of the anime embody this perfectly.
I've seen and read people theories across the internet and comes to three conclusions:
1. Its Alternate timelines where Rafal was raised by a scholar instead of a priest.
Points suggesting it: In ch/ep 1, Rafal was raised by a priest. Yet Adult Rafal mentioned he was raised by a scholar. This could possibly suggest an alternate what if scenario. Implications also suggest that Adult Rafal timeline is the our real one.
Points against it: There's not much evidence to suggest the sudden timeline PoV shift. And also doesn't explain why Rafal letter to Potoski still exist in this timeline. Although the latter can still be explained as constant point in both timelines even if Rafal story itself changed.
2. Rafal survived the execution and made an escape.
Points suggesting it: We never seen Rafal corpse, we only see him tied up, and then the executor light up the torch, and next panel shows a burnt wood without any trace of corpse or even bones. I've read somewhere that Poppy seeds are good for helping people sleep and they aren't venomous at all. The discrepancy of his origin can be be summed as him lying to mask himself away from Novak.
Points against it: It was pretty much shown Novak was there overseeing the execution till the end, which makes the scenario where Rafal able to escape sounds absurd.
3. They are different people.
Points suggesting it: It explain the discrepancy in his origin, and ensure that Rafal did die back then and thus creating no plot hole.
Point against it: It feel too much coincidence that there's exist two Rafal with similar face and interest.
Counter point: Name being similar isn't too odd, but the appearance being the same could be just metaphor by the author. As both Rafal embody the reckless desire in pursuit of knowledge/truth, both embody the same ideal but on the opposite side of a coin.
Regardless which is it I salute the author for leaving one final mystery to close the series. Not only it worked to leave a long lasting discourse for the readers/watchers, but it also it stays true with series' spirit of reaching for the truth. The last page of the manga and also the last scene of the anime embody this perfectly.
