Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- May 22, 2020
- Messages
- 209
You know you dont need to self-insert as him right?sigh Why is our male protagonist so pathetic.
You know you dont need to self-insert as him right?sigh Why is our male protagonist so pathetic.
I don't think you wanna see it lest you want to feel inadequate.Big words now show your dick size
I don't. If I did I wouldn't even comment dude lol. Don't defend the patheticness of the male protagonist dude.You know you dont need to self-insert as him right?
lmao look at this mf, giving details about sex that don’t just come from pornOkay. I need you men to understand. Size doesn't matter the way you think. Sometimes being smaller is better. And often being too big is painful for your partner. The two things that matter most in sex are: technique and compatibility.
LOL of course Touka Scott would be the one to lay the groundwork for this intellectual breakthrough. Incredible .The Shortstack Theorem continues to be proven right at every turn
No, it is meant to say that she's small and because of that she's small down there too. But I probably should have used better wording.@Sullieman I don't think that "and" in the 3rd panel's 1st speech bubble is supposed to be there.
Okay, now that I reread after what you said that, I kinda see what you were trying to do. But yeah, that phrasing is an awkward and easily misunderstandable way to do that. I would suggest something like "Since I'm tiny... that place... is tiny too..."No, it is meant to say that she's small and because of that she's small down there too. But I probably should have used better wording.
Yeah, I changed the line for better reading. Anyway, thanks.Okay, now that I reread after what you said that, I kinda see what you were trying to do. But yeah, that phrasing is an awkward and easily misunderstandable way to do that. I would suggest something like "Since I'm tiny... that place... is tiny too..."
I'm pretty sure that guy's talking out of his ass actually - all of the math makes it look smart, but when you actually work out the logic it doesn't make a whole lot of sense, and I went over it in more detail in that thread (I'm XionGaTaosenai on Danbooru).The Shortstack Theorem continues to be proven right at every turn
I'd be willing to bet that the Patreon request that led to this comic was inspired by this tweet, which measures the thighs in proportion to height of the head, not hip width. If that's your metric, widening the hips is a perfectly viable method of getting more "thigh budget", as it were - at least until you hit the aforementioned "nonsensical anatomy and fringe erotica territory".
I have no idea what "Touka Scott's factor" is, but thickness is all about proportion, so of course reducing height without changing any other measurements will make those other measurements more significant in proportion - but increasing all those other measurements without changing height would have the exact same effect.
Here's a thought experiment - take your ideal shortstack with the desired amounts of thigh width and thigh gap, and then scale that character up by a factor of two, doubling their height but also all of their other measurements. Then, compare two separate pictures, one of the original character and one of the scaled up version, with no background or objective reference point to compare their size to. Would you be able to visually distinguish the original character from the scaled up version? If the scaled up character is scaled up perfectly proportionately, you would not - the two would look totally identical without having an external reference point to establish scale. Therefore, any qualities of their appearance that don't depend on scale with outside objects - such as proportional thickness or thigh gap - must be identical across both versions.
My inference, then, is that halving height while maintaining all other proportions would have the exact same result as doubling all other proportions while maintaining height - the results are indistinguishable save for overall scale. Therefore, you cannot argue that widening the hips does not work, but shortening the height does.
Dude, it's very obviously a joke.I'm pretty sure that guy's talking out of his ass actually - all of the math makes it look smart, but when you actually work out the logic it doesn't make a whole lot of sense, and I went over it in more detail in that thread (I'm XionGaTaosenai on Danbooru).
I mean, I figured that "Touka Scott's factor" was something the guy made up as a reference to either a character or an artist of some kind, but I also figured that looking it up would just bombard me with porn that I didn't want to see. I'm honestly really surprised to see that it actually came from something relatively tame.the fact that you think "Touka Scott's factor" is a real thing is actually funnier than the post itself lmao
You're taking the bust measurement as a linear figure, when it's basically the perimeter. For a very rough estimate, 112cm makes for a circle of about 36cm diameter. Here I'd squash that circle into an ellipse since normally the torso is wider than the chest projects out, but in her case I'm pretty sure a circle is fine. So she's got about a foot from front to back so her boobs would be around 15-20cm diameter, so a regular dick could still poke out.If her boob measurement is 112 cm from a previous chp and we take off a highly generous 30 cm or even more from the back to the sternum. Her breasts would at least jut out to 92 cm. His dick has popped out during a tit job in previous chapters meaning he's packing. Even if we account for displacement of the breasts like squishing and movement, dude is hung. I'm Sure someone will figure out the exact Dimensions, I'm too tired to properly do the measurements and math