Danjo-hi 1:39 no Heikou Sekai wa Omoi no Hoka Futsuu - Ch. 291.999 - Notice on Redrawing

[Devvyy]

MC was basically adding fuel to a fire and, since the main plot was to make sure the family trust the school and the classroom, this last chapters would've made too difficult to continue without creating some sort of plothole down the line.
The author may change the scenario that MC gives Sensei to one that can be done without making Sensei look like a crazy person.
That or make Sensei have more mental strength and be able to act without breaking down.

She mentioned she was a theater major, so if one girl just started clapping and applauding her "performance" other girls might get it and join in, causing her to snap to her senses. Sou could rescue the situation leading to another misunderstanding down the line, there's any number of things you could do. I don't think there was a problem at all that a little creative writing couldn't fix. Hell, turning her into a stalker could lead to some funny interactions in future chapters.

 

[DLRevan]

This kind of sucks, but it is what it is. I wish he could write his way out of this 'hole', though. I wonder if there was complaints in the home country about those two chapters.

Also, I hope they stay up here somehow.

Just a random slightly off-topic but reading a comment like this made something really apparent to me. Let me preface this by saying this is not a criticism, just an observation.

Recently this big thing with Hideo Kojima and his studio being dropped by Sony happened. A lot of consternation ensued, and even articles about what really happened occurred are released by pundits with shaky sources.

Later a post by Kojima's studio was released in both English and Japanese denouncing those articles, basically saying only they, Sony and Xbox (which picked up their game) know what happened, and asking fans not to speculate. The subtext is also clearly aimed at those pundits trying to sound like they are in the know.

The comments under either version of the post couldn't be more different. Under Japanese, fans state the usual support for Kojima's studio going forward, while also saying here and there that they are glad they are trying to preserve the relationship with Sony and that they look forward to whatever positive might come from this.

Under English, nobody really addresses the studio directly and it devolves into conspiratorial level speculation about what the post really means, how much is boilerplate, what was not 'denied' and therefore is 'true' about the accusations. Everyone appears to want someone to 'lose', and there is also speculation about what the Japanese fans think, which is funny cuse the relevant post and replies are kind of just 'next door'.

This comment section feels a little bit like that to me. Not a lot, just a bit. But all of that just makes me wonder due to the context. Obviously nobody here addresses Kisa directly because they assume they are not reading the comments here. And even on creator socials, English speakers may act in a way where they assume Japanese creators do not read or do not understand English posts.

I wonder if in general, anime and gaming pop culture has just evolved the way it has, because of this natural disconnect. Unfortunately, if it has, I also think it results in rather negative leaning runarounds in discussion. The natural course most humans take when talking about someone else who isn't in the room is usually a spiral into pointless gossip.

 

[chojinra]

Just a random slightly off-topic but reading a comment like this made something really apparent to me. Let me preface this by saying this is not a criticism, just an observation.

Recently this big thing with Hideo Kojima and his studio being dropped by Sony happened. A lot of consternation ensued, and even articles about what really happened occurred are released by pundits with shaky sources.

Later a post by Kojima's studio was released in both English and Japanese denouncing those articles, basically saying only they, Sony and Xbox (which picked up their game) know what happened, and asking fans not to speculate. The subtext is also clearly aimed at those pundits trying to sound like they are in the know.

The comments under either version of the post couldn't be more different. Under Japanese, fans state the usual support for Kojima's studio going forward, while also saying here and there that they are glad they are trying to preserve the relationship with Sony and that they look forward to whatever positive might come from this.

Under English, nobody really addresses the studio directly and it devolves into conspiratorial level speculation about what the post really means, how much is boilerplate, what was not 'denied' and therefore is 'true' about the accusations. Everyone appears to want someone to 'lose', and there is also speculation about what the Japanese fans think, which is funny cuse the relevant post and replies are kind of just 'next door'.

This comment section feels a little bit like that to me. Not a lot, just a bit. But all of that just makes me wonder due to the context. Obviously nobody here addresses Kisa directly because they assume they are not reading the comments here. And even on creator socials, English speakers may act in a way where they assume Japanese creators do not read or do not understand English posts.

I wonder if in general, anime and gaming pop culture has just evolved the way it has, because of this natural disconnect. Unfortunately, if it has, I also think it results in rather negative leaning runarounds in discussion. The natural course most humans take when talking about someone else who isn't in the room is usually a spiral into pointless gossip.

If I get what you are writing, there’s probably a matter of different experiences. People in Japan probably trusts all the parties involved, likes what they’re seeing with the transparency, and will see how it will develop in the future.

People in the west have a (somewhat) healthy distrust of corporations, have seen individual creators get stifled and worked over, and notice that some companies have a track record of shooting themselves in foot.

Whether this is the case or not remains to be seen, but due to previous experiences, most news will be seen through a distrustful, speculative lens.

 

[DLRevan]

If I get what you are writing, there’s probably a matter of different experiences. People in Japan probably trusts all the parties involved, likes what they’re seeing with the transparency, and will see how it will develop in the future.

People in the west have a (somewhat) healthy distrust of corporations, have seen individual creators get stifled and worked over, and notice that some companies have a track record of shooting themselves in foot.

Whether this is the case or not remains to be seen, but due to previous experiences, most news will be seen through a distrustful, speculative lens.

I think there's a lot of factors including the view of corporations and public news. But since you brought it up, that at least is something I'd be critical of. I don't really think it's healthy when this causes antagonistic relationships in the western public sphere to be the default. While on a small scale, skepticism has probably caused some improvements in products and services, in the long run, especially over the course of decades, I think it has created a widening disconnect between companies, consumers and creators that actually enables people who would seek to extract maximal gain without understanding the business. And it becomes a vicious cycle perpetrated by all sides.

I should have mentioned that angle anyway and distinguished it because I wanted to present another possible cause, which is more unique to anime fandom. There can be more than one influence or reason behind the way people act.

What you say I totally agree with, but I think in anime fandom there is this other thing where there is a massive disconnect between creators and fans that maybe can't be overcome without a generational change. Even now when it's easy to connect with creators, it is simply not in the culture of readers and viewers to see them as a real person except maybe as a collection of commonly applied socially relevant labels.

 

[luigiymario2]

Already read them lmao, so I guess we still gotta wait a little longer for more fun!

 

[kimono]

I hope he can keep

 

[Phantasmoon]

From what I saw at the spanish chap, it seems that the author could not keep up the whole "Sou is naive to what he does" gimmick if he kept going in this route. That was probably what really caused him to want to retcon it.

Cause he certainly does not care about age difference stuff, "cough mom cough".

As Descartes said in the times of yore: "Men are loyal to boobs, not the one who carries them"

 

[TuzoIvan]

Oh, no! Phoenixman again!