Danjo-hi 1:5 no Sekai demo Futsuu ni Ikirareru to Omotta?: Gekiomoi Kanjou na Kanojo-tachi ga Mujikaku Danshi ni Honrou Saretara - Ch. 12

[Eighty-six]

oh I don’t know literally adding a middle school female character?
it’s pretty obvious enough but you didn’t seem to comprehend it when I made my first comment here

Clearly, I did. I just wanted to be charitable and supposed the possibility that an assertion that didn't make sense was merely being misunderstood by me (not least of all because you didn't write your first two comments all that well)-- so I asked to make sure.

What kind of pedophilia is being channeled by the author when said author is writing a harem where the ML has two women his age, a woman older than him, and a woman only somewhat younger than him in addition to the middle schooler? How does the entire work become a conduit for some hypothesized pedophilia when the main conceit is obviously that at least two of the girls are unhinged and all five of them are promised to be intense/obsessive/possessive in their love? How does that work when Yuka is shown to be under the same social burdens as the other heroines when it comes to finding a viable lover, but that aspect of their society was introduced not with Yuka but with the two heroines that are Masato's age?

I already talked some about how loli-type characters have been used in otaku-oriented media for a long time. I already talked about my own appreciation for age gap romantic fiction in general, which can't be a unique perspective given the relative popularity of the premise. I figured that and all the aforementioned would be enough to establish that there are more likely explanations for the inclusion of a loli-type heroine than "the author is a pedophile".

Hell, I'm sure you haven't been cursed with knowledge, either-- there are manga floating about where you'll actually ask "is this mangaka a pedophile", that I'd actually back you up and say "yeah, that's a distinct possibility". Calling this "tame" would be understating things.

 

[excitionzero]

Clearly, I did. I just wanted to be charitable and supposed the possibility that an assertion that didn't make sense was merely being misunderstood by me (not least of all because you didn't write your first two comments all that well)-- so I asked to make sure.

What kind of pedophilia is being channeled by the author when said author is writing a harem where the ML has two women his age, a woman older than him, and a woman only somewhat younger than him in addition to the middle schooler? How does the entire work become a conduit for some hypothesized pedophilia when the main conceit is obviously that at least two of the girls are unhinged and all five of them are promised to be intense/obsessive/possessive in their love? How does that work when Yuka is shown to be under the same social burdens as the other heroines when it comes to finding a viable lover, but that aspect of their society was introduced not with Yuka but with the two heroines that are Masato's age?

I already talked some about how loli-type characters have been used in otaku-oriented media for a long time. I already talked about my own appreciation for age gap romantic fiction in general, which can't be a unique perspective given the relative popularity of the premise. I figured that and all the aforementioned would be enough to establish that there are more likely explanations for the inclusion of a loli-type heroine than "the author is a pedophile".

Hell, I'm sure you haven't been cursed with knowledge, either-- there are manga floating about where you'll actually ask "is this mangaka a pedophile", that I'd actually back you up and say "yeah, that's a distinct possibility". Calling this "tame" would be understating things.

I never said it was tame
All I’m saying that it was literally the author pulling shits out of his ass making the middle school girl a thing

 

[Eighty-six]

I never said it was tame

No, I'm saying that this is extremely tame in terms of what could be-- and has been-- done with similar parameters, by other authors.

All I’m saying that it was literally the author pulling shits out of his ass making the middle school girl a thing

When you say "a thing", are you referring to her being a heroine at all, or to her efforts actually bearing fruit in the portion of the WN that has yet to be adapted? I find the former to just be part of the premise (and not a "pulling of shit out of the ass", as I understand the concept).

 

[excitionzero]

No, I'm saying that this is extremely tame in terms of what could be-- and has been-- done with similar parameters, by other authors.


When you say "a thing", are you referring to her being a heroine at all, or to her efforts actually bearing fruit in the portion of the WN that has yet to be adapted? I find the former to just be part of the premise (and not a "pulling of shit out of the ass", as I understand the concept).

yeah sure if the story went down with the dude goes doki doki for the middle school girl then I have nothing else to say other than this story shouldn’t even exist
and the fact that you even confused with the first comment I’ve made show me that you have some problem comprehending what I said back there
like why even asked if you’re just gonna reply back that it’s not the main point? She’s a literal middle school girl
what else is there that you don’t understand?

 

[Eighty-six]

yeah sure if the story went down with the dude goes doki doki for the middle school girl then I have nothing else to say other than this story shouldn’t even exist

You can't keep talking about how I have problems comprehending you and not only ignore what I said on that matter, and not only continue to write with poor grammar, but also give me non sequiturs that I'll be inclined to try to get clarification for.

Really, what does this question have to do with the question I just asked?

 

[excitionzero]

You can't keep talking about how I have problems comprehending you and not only ignore what I said on that matter, and not only continue to write with poor grammar, but also give me non sequiturs that I'll be inclined to try to get clarification for.

Really, what does this question have to do with the question I just asked?

honestly why even asked in the first place? What’s the point of it

 

[Eighty-six]

honestly why even asked in the first place? What’s the point of it

...because I wanted to figure out what you chose to say to me.

 

[excitionzero]

everyone keeps saying how that 'Yuka is best girl' and all but this entire story feels like the author just use her as a fucking way for pedo bullshits going on

this one is literally the one you were confused
and I’ve already said enough on it
what else is there to be confused of?
it doesn’t even aim toward you in the first place
why are you even bothering? @Eighty-six

 

[Eighty-six]

this one is literally the one you were confused

Even without me having explained it by now, you know for a fact that back then I was asking for clarification out of charity and not out of actual confusion.

what else is there to be confused of?

Nothing that I trust I can get clarification from you about, at this point.

it doesn’t even aim toward you in the first place

No; rather, it was generally aimed and open for anybody to respond to, and I wanted to get more of your perspective. Anybody could tell that because I started by acknowledging the normality of disliking this trope, then proceeded to talk about my own perspective. I did actively disagree with the notion that the author was certainly a pedophile given the contradicting narrative elements, and then you proceeded to not address any of that while using ambiguous phrasing I was confused about. And instead of clarifying when I asked, you run off a non sequitur-- you didn't even dismiss the points made, you just didn't acknowledge them.

I figured we'd be having a chill-enough conversation about perspectives rather than you defaulting to surface level moral outrage and insults (to the point of disjoint responses) given that this heroine was introduced as a heroine in chapter three, we're on chapter 12, this is the third Yuka-centered chapter so far, you were long aware of where this story was going to go according to its source material, and yet you (and I) are both still here.

 

[excitionzero]

Even without me having explained it by now, you know for a fact that back then I was asking for clarification out of charity and not out of actual confusion.


Nothing that I trust I can get clarification from you about, at this point.


No; rather, it was generally aimed and open for anybody to respond to, and I wanted to get more of your perspective. Anybody could tell that because I started by acknowledging the normality of disliking this trope, then proceeded to talk about my own perspective. I did actively disagree with the notion that the author was certainly a pedophile given the contradicting narrative elements, and then you proceeded to not address any of that while using ambiguous phrasing I was confused about. And instead of clarifying when I asked, you run off a non sequitur-- you didn't even dismiss the points made, you just didn't acknowledge them.

I figured we'd be having a chill-enough conversation about perspectives rather than you defaulting to surface level moral outrage and insults (to the point of disjoint responses) given that this heroine was introduced as a heroine in chapter three, we're on chapter 12, this is the third Yuka-centered chapter so far, you were long aware of where this story was going to go according to its source material, and yet you (and I) are both still here.

and I’ve already gave you the answers multiple times
All are straight-forward no strings attached
that’s it

 

[booterror]

Time to do some schliking with the shoe

* sneaker floor squeaking sounds intensify *

 

[travistravin]

dam is he gonna marry all of them or is this gonna turn into horror

 

[kuzunagi13]

I would definitely be pissed off if this goes on for long and nothing happens..

 

[Xakorik]

Yuka best girl

 

[FriesAreCool]

absolute peak

 

[dkuro]

If men are less 20% of their population, then how the f#ck polygamy is still not a thing yet their society is still standing ? (The remaining unsatisfied 60% of the population wouldn't probably stay silent, would it ?)

 

[Dyrel]

From reading some of the spoilers It seems that she is the most hungriest one for him out of his harem, yes, Yuka is more 'dangerous' then Seira the 'Yandere' office lady

Well that's surprising, maybe because she's someone high overheels that wanted skinship so bad she's more dangerous that's the the yandere that's more overprotective and have higher chance to hurt other girl to drive them away rather than hurting him (if she can be violent)

 

[excitionzero]

Yuka best girl

say the one who couldn’t kept their stupidity for themselves
why don’t you go fuck yourself already

 

[emos_sukc]

if I'm correct in the novel she gRapes him

 

[excitionzero]

if I'm correct in the novel she gRapes him

…what the fuck?