As expected, the author doesn't seem to know the nature of good and evil.
How is it? It's so simple, so obvious. How could I be the only one? Yet, am I?
Good and evil are not absolutes. They are relatives. What's good for me may not be good for you. Me eating a chicken is good for me. It's obviously evil for the chicken. And a bit less obvious, there is actual and perceived good and evil which might not allign perfectly or, sometimes, at all.
And of course, causality, i.e. the universe does't care, as only something alive, with needs/goals can affect meanings like good&evil to elements of their suroundings.
Is it that hard? Such lack of wisdom from pretty much everyone, it is so terrifying.