Dōu Zhuǎnshēng le, Wǒ Cái Bùyào Zài Gěi Nǐ Bǔmó! - Vol. 1 Ch. 10 - You Were Married?!

[Zhangar]

My own impression is that while the original relationship was entirely non-consensual, an amusing wrinkle occurred - Elysia turned out to be a lesbian masochist.

Getting brutally dominated by a hot wolfgirl turned out to be exactly what she wanted, even if ever admitting that would feel like an act of insanity.

And she never did admit it, so Rachel has no idea that Elysia was into it. Leaving Rachel incredibly confused that Elysia wants to pick up where they left off.

It'd be funny in a really mean way if Rachel was straight and the whole thing really was transactional to her, but I assume that's not where this story is going.

Edit: Have they shown us what the male beast folk look like?

 

[ezzhead]

Yeah, but the other guy didn't say there was neither. As he said so himself, It was a question, not an affirmation. But, istead of just understanding that and dropping It, Uden had to act like the usual asshole and getting defensive. Maybe he should just chill out instead of showing an agressive side I'm sure he'll never show in the real world.

Well yeah he didn't literally say that it was a retcon for certain, but he did bring up the possibility even though it seems pretty clear that we just don't have a lot of information right now about their relationship. It's kinda weird to assume there are retcons 10 chapters into the manga. Maybe Uden did get over defensive but some people are just argumentative. I am too, it doesn't make you an asshole and it doesn't necessarily make you aggressive. (Especially when what you're saying isn't exactly wrong in the first place) Sometimes people just have more to say and they feel more free to say those things on the Internet. Most of the time it's horrible things that aren't socially acceptable in real life but sometimes it's just a bit hard to express your thoughts irl. More anxiety involved idk. People are complicated.

 

[GLFanatic]

Well yeah he didn't literally say that it was a retcon for certain, but he did bring up the possibility even though it seems pretty clear that we just don't have a lot of information right now about their relationship. It's kinda weird to assume there are retcons 10 chapters into the manga. Maybe Uden did get over defensive but some people are just argumentative. I am too, it doesn't make you an asshole and it doesn't necessarily make you aggressive. (Especially when what you're saying isn't exactly wrong in the first place) Sometimes people just have more to say and they feel more free to say those things on the Internet. Most of the time it's horrible things that aren't socially acceptable in real life but sometimes it's just a bit hard to express your thoughts irl. More anxiety involved idk. People are complicated.

Exactly. He brought up just a possibility and not even once started It as a fact. Something this trivial should not stir such an unproportional response. Its creating conflict just for the sake of it. And saying that it "shouldnt even be a question" as Uden said, puts in check the other side of expression opinion. Its clear arrogance and narcissism. You are an asshole when one part tries to deescalate and you still presses through. And this is something Uden does all the time. This was just one example of many. He is not just conbative. This is the majority of his personality on this platform. But he can't take it and gets defensive when he is called out on his bullshit. Which also makes him an hypocrite.

 

[ezzhead]

Exactly. He brought up just a possibility and not even once started It as a fact. Something this trivial should not stir such an unproportional response. Its creating conflict just for the sake of it. And saying that it "shouldnt even be a question" as Uden said, puts in check the other side of expression opinion. Its clear arrogance and narcissism. You are an asshole when one part tries to deescalate and you still presses through. And this is something Uden does all the time. This was just one example of many. He is not just conbative. This is the majority of his personality on this platform. But he can't take it and gets defensive when he is called out on his bullshit. Which also makes him an hypocrite.

Yeah so you just think choosing to debate with people on the Internet somehow means you're over defensive and an asshole and a narcissist and that just doesn't make sense to me. What does ego have to do with any of this? How does it make you a bad person even if we assume he's consciously trying to start debates with people? Even if one side doesn't want to argue or debate and he keeps talking they can just let him keep talking. They don't have to engage, and you're imagining aggression and frustration behind the screen when that's likely just not the case at all. If it was, then he'd have to be mad at everybody all the time for seemingly no reason. If he does it all the time then he probably just likes spending his time like this. I do too, debates are fun, and if I get frustrated with someone I just stop cause I don't feel like putting their bullshit. You seem more aggravated than anyone else does to me.

 

[GLFanatic]

Yeah so you just think choosing to debate with people on the Internet somehow means you're over defensive and an asshole and a narcissist and that just doesn't make sense to me. What does ego have to do with any of this? How does it make you a bad person even if we assume he's consciously trying to start debates with people? Even if one side doesn't want to argue or debate and he keeps talking they can just let him keep talking. They don't have to engage, and you're imagining aggression and frustration behind the screen when that's likely just not the case at all. If it was, then he'd have to be mad at everybody all the time for seemingly no reason. If he does it all the time then he probably just likes spending his time like this. I do too, debates are fun, and if I get frustrated with someone I just stop cause I don't feel like putting their bullshit. You seem more aggravated than anyone else does to me.

Sorry, but if you really can't see that, you are not very good at interpretation. You can very much tell how the other is feeling by the way they use the words. I mean... you pretty much did the same to me at the end of your text, saying I seem aggravated. But I'm not allowed to do the same? When I do it, is wrong? Seems like a clear case of double standard to me. I could very much use your logic the other way around. He could've just ignore the other party when they wanted to disengage. You could've ignore my initial comment as well, but you didn't. You initiated this conversation, remember? Not me. You don't do what you preach. If he wants to spend his time with unecessary conflict, why can't I vent my frustration about it? Why don't you tell Uden to follow your example and stop when he got frustrated with a simple question? But no... You only came after me. Again: Double standard. To finalize. How do you know there is no agression in his words? In the same way you say I can't tell, I can throw this argument right back at you. Unless you have some mystical power that allows you to tell one's state of mind through text alone. Otherwise, the only thing we have is interpretation. And, as I said: You don't seem to be very good at it. Oh, but don't take this at heart. I can guarantee you, there is no aggression behind my words.