Double Helix Blossom - Vol. 4 Ch. 33

Dex-chan lover
Joined
Aug 15, 2020
Messages
108
The most ordinary pretentious rival of the main characters, I do not see any special problems.
I mean just imagine you have a friend that always proposes a girl every time he finds a girl.
I'd kick him in his nut every time he does that.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
May 14, 2018
Messages
5,284
I mean just imagine you have a friend that always proposes a girl every time he finds a girl.
I'd kick him in his nut every time he does that.
Wow wow, why are you so hostile? This is the most ordinary silly harmless character's quirk, not even some "comedic" harassment. Moreover, I can argue that if it were a stereotypical prince-sh lesbian who flirted with every female character or even any character, then this did not cause you such hostility at all.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Aug 15, 2020
Messages
108
Wow wow, why are you so hostile? This is the most ordinary silly harmless character's quirk, not even some "comedic" harassment. Moreover, I can argue that if it were a stereotypical prince-sh lesbian who flirted with every female character or even any character, then this did not cause you such hostility at all.
I admit that the gender does matter because even if he's changed to a prince type lesbian it doesn't change anything at all. So why bother to include man just to be her rival that seldom shows up in the series? Satisfied?
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
May 14, 2018
Messages
5,284
I admit that the gender does matter because even if he's changed to a prince type lesbian it doesn't change anything at all. So why bother to include man just to be her rival that seldom shows up in the series? Satisfied?
The gender does not mean anything to you, but at the same time you literally admit that you are a triggering about adding MALE character - yes, I am satisfied. Fully.
 
Banned
Joined
May 2, 2020
Messages
265
The most ordinary pretentious rival of the main characters, I do not see any special problems. Moreover, "also". Do you really dislike the character because of his gender?
it's pretentious edgy douche type character, i mean the word "pretentious" itself would make most people roll their eyes so hard. now my question, are you defend him so hard because of his gender?
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
May 14, 2018
Messages
5,284
There is nothing edgy or douchy in him (not to mention the fact that the "pretentious" most common literary word, I do not know who "rolls eyes" there), this is the most ordinary ambitious shonen rival, which the author tried to make more memorable due to silly quirks. You just desperately look for the reason to justify the dislike of this dude in your eyes. And no, I do not defending him. I just want to say that such excessive hostility towards the characters because of their gender is ridiculous and clearly makes me remember how fujoshi loved to attack female characters simply because of the lack of a member in their pants.
 
Banned
Joined
May 2, 2020
Messages
265
There is nothing edgy or douchy in him (not to mention the fact that the "pretentious" most common literary word, I do not know who "rolls eyes" there), this is the most ordinary ambitious shonen rival, which the author tried to make more memorable due to silly quirks. You just desperately look for the reason to justify the dislike of this dude in your eyes. And no, I do not defending him. I just want to say that such excessive hostility towards the characters because of their gender is ridiculous and clearly makes me remember how fujoshi loved to attack female characters simply because of the lack of a member in their pants.
There is nothing edgy or douchy in him
damn, should i list all of his line? even when he first introduce during pyrokinetic terorist case he act like a douchebag. it's weird you pretend he's not

this is the most ordinary ambitious shonen rival
doesn't mean it's not annoying, why are you pretending generic trait are beyond criticism ?

which the author tried to make more memorable due to silly quirks
memorable doesn't mean quality, everybody remember usagi drop ending. doesn't mean it's good or sophisticated

You just desperately look for the reason to justify the dislike of this dude in your eyes
You just desperately look for the reason to justify the like of this dude in your eyes

And no, I do not defending him
you sure?

I just want to say that such excessive hostility towards the characters because of their gender
and i just want to say that such excessive favoritism towards the characters because of their gender is ridiculous. he's act like douchebag, i can dislike and call him a douchebag. being generic douches doesn't mean its not annoying, plain in simple

how fujoshi loved to attack female characters
well i'm not from that crowd, i just hate annoying character.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
May 14, 2018
Messages
5,284
damn, should i list all of his line? even when he first introduce during pyrokinetic terorist case he act like a douchebag. it's weird you pretend he's not


doesn't mean it's not annoying, why are you pretending generic trait are beyond criticism ?


memorable doesn't mean quality, everybody remember usagi drop ending. doesn't mean it's good or sophisticated


You just desperately look for the reason to justify the like of this dude in your eyes


you sure?


and i just want to say that such excessive favoritism towards the characters because of their gender is ridiculous. he's act like douchebag, i can dislike and call him a douchebag. being generic douches doesn't mean its not annoying, plain in simple


well i'm not from that crowd, i just hate annoying character.
You literally separately answered each sentence in my post to make it as personal and tedious as possible. This is clearly much more and deeper than just irritation by “annoying character”. Especially if you pay attention to the fact that in a number of moments you simply did not know what to say and just bait me on a dispute for a dispute (no, "No, you!", scarecrows and other bait are not arguments). However, I already added you to ignor in the past, so I see no reason to repeat my mistake again. You will still try to leave the last word, so I simply will not waste time on another potential flame bait on exhaustion.
 
Last edited:
Banned
Joined
May 2, 2020
Messages
265
You literally separately answered each sentence in my post to make it as personal and tedious as possible. This is clearly much more and deeper than just irritation by “annoying character”. Especially if you pay attention to the fact that in a number of moments you simply did not know what to say and just bait me on a dispute for a dispute (no, "No, you!", scarecrows and other bait are not arguments). However, I already added you to ignor in the past, so I see no reason to repeat my mistake again. You will still try to leave the last word, so I simply will not waste time on another potential flame bait on exhaustion.
You literally separately answered each sentence in my post to make it as personal and tedious as possible
its just easier and better this way. make it personal? care to explain why?
This is clearly much more and deeper than just irritation by “annoying character”
you could stop being delusional for a sec and actually say something or debunk my point, you know?
Especially if you pay attention to the fact that in a number of moments you simply did not know
which one?
and just bait me on a dispute for a dispute (no, "No, you!"
oh your armchairs psychologist expert moment?"You just desperately look for the reason to justify the dislike of this dude in your eyes" you just made up BS and i have to take it seriously, just make better argument then lmao
However, I already added you to ignor in the past, so I see no reason to repeat my mistake again
ah so it's the second time i humiliate you? got it. it's funny you persistent against the other guy because you thought he's an easy prey to dunk on but the moment you lost you folded so hard and ranaway. really makes you think huh?

anyway,yes, I am satisfied. Fully.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top