The monk is such a fascinating character in retrospect. He represents a larger, subtle form of misogyny that subverts the reader’s expectations. Buddhism, and by extension that people practice it, are usually depicted as all-compassionate and empathetic. The monk is almost the complete opposite: he automatically assumes Shim Chong (rightfully or wrongfully so) of stealing, degrades the bride for marrying rich, and actively tries to groom Shim Chong to the absoluteness of his teachings. Despite all of this, he’s not “religiously technically” wrong. Women, according to many denominations of Buddhism at that time, had inherent “sin” even if they could reach Nirvana. Their karmic retribution (as the monk keeps reiterating) influenced the monk to be incredibly prejudice and self righteous. As many have pointed out, the monk relies on generous donations to the temple while he berates Shim Chong for stealing.
It’s fascinating that he casually mentions that he “left” the secular world. Shim Chong doesn’t have the same privilege - she can’t leave her father, nor can she join any temples as a monk. The visual contrast is stark: the monk looks prim and clean, while Shim Chong, burdened with “worldly troubles,” is wearing rags with messy hair. It’s a well done critique against the sexism of institutionalized religion. The monk is certainly not an exception in his viewpoints.
On a final note, the monk was essentially insinuating that the young bride was a liar, fake, or a whore with that powder comment lol.