How Did a Pro Player Like Me End Up as a Max-Level Priestess in Another World? - Vol. 1 Ch. 2 - Lemme Lick You Dry, M'lady!

[Koneko_Nyaa]

Where's my clingy dragon girl?

 

[gr2222]

shouldn't this have the gl tag? why was it removed?

 

[MostlyHumanTLs]

shouldn't this have the gl tag? why was it removed?

'Cause it's yuri bait.

 

[gr2222]

'Cause it's yuri bait.

yeah but, it's not a romance, there is no romance tag on it, so obviously there won't be any romantic progress, and people will see the tags, and understand that. But it still should have the GL tag, since there are a lot scenes like the one in the end of this chapter.

GL doesn't always mean romance.

edit: also, it's technically not yuri bait because it doesn't have the romance tag. besides, just 'hinting' is enough for it to be GL, after all this is chinese, and due to laws, they simply can't make it a romance, and they are just hinting it.

 

[JusrKora]

yeah but, it's not a romance, there is no romance tag on it, so obviously there won't be any romantic progress, and people will see the tags, and understand that. But it still should have the GL tag, since there are a lot scenes like the one in the end of this chapter.

GL doesn't always mean romance.

edit: also, it's technically not yuri bait because it doesn't have the romance tag. besides, just 'hinting' is enough for it to be GL, after all this is chinese, and due to laws, they simply can't make it a romance, and they are just hinting it.

It cant be gl since mc before transmigration was a man.

China doesnt have laws against lgbtq actually

 

[gr2222]

It cant be gl since mc before transmigration was a man.

China doesnt have laws against lgbtq actually

Also you may be confusing "yuri" and "GL"

GL = girls' love
(Love between girls)

Yuri = bonds between 2 girls
(Could be close friendship and whatnot)

what are you on about? yes, the mc was a man, however his body now is that of a girl's, genderswap has nothing to do with it being GL or not, since now HE IS a girl. The tag has nothing to do with what the mc is on the inside. besides there is the genderswap tag, so people will understand to begin with.

Also tell that to the Chinese authors that are in prison because they wrote and sold books with same sex relationships or whatever.

edit: i didn't even see your edit xd, no that's not what yuri is. Yuri is actually straight up female to female sexual relationship, when GL can be 'just hinting' at it. in japanese LN/WN shoujo ai is GL, and Yuri is straight up lesbian. also yuri is the flower named lily, i am not going to go into details on it's history though, look it up yourself.

edit 2: i just saw the 'last edited' time stamp on the comment and i am now confused, i think mangadex is a bit broken maybe? idk.

 

[JusrKora]

Also tell that to the Chinese authors that are in prison because they wrote and sold books with same sex relationships or whatever.

you're gonna have to state who since the only one who pops up when searching "chinese prison same sex novel" is Tianyi who's imprisoned for 10 years for writing a EROTIC homosexual novel.

China is quite literally against any nsfw content and has laws against anything nsfw.

Also, a few baihe scanlators came together and complied a doc about yuri in china:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/...9IAjujZroDtxBJ5eA/edit#heading=h.ot4oin159vdu

So yeah, there's no laws against lgbtq whatsoever in china.

 

[gr2222]

you're gonna have to state who since the only one who pops up when searching "chinese prison same sex novel" is Tianyi who's imprisoned for 10 years for writing a EROTIC homosexual novel.

China is quite literally against any nsfw content and has laws against anything nsfw.

Also, a few baihe scanlators came together and complied a doc about yuri in china:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/...9IAjujZroDtxBJ5eA/edit#heading=h.ot4oin159vdu

So yeah, there's no laws against lgbtq whatsoever in china.

yea, you are right about that, sorry, i just remember reading about it a few years ego, but didn't double check it.

Although the document is a bit wrong, i just looked it up, and censorship is needed if you sell the books or whatever it is, not just with mainstream things, and if you are reported selling them while being uncensored, you will have legal trouble.

 

[AeourDealgert]

Well, here we go again...

 

[JusrKora]

Although the document is a bit wrong, i just looked it up, and censorship is needed if you sell the books or whatever it is, not just with mainstream things, and if you are reported selling them while being uncensored, you will have legal trouble.

'for the most part overt censorship only affects "mainstream" stuff like published books and TV series'

 

[SirCole]

Ex:
View attachment 16989
View attachment 16992
I'm guessing his translator couldn't comprehend this easy chinese idiom and LT didn't bother doing 2 seconds of additional research for it and decided to leave it out.

I „researched“ this idiom and found this out,

The Chinese phrase in the image is:
“听君一席话，如听一席话”

original idiom “听君一席话，胜读十年书”, which means "Listening to your words is better than reading ten years' worth of books", implying that someone’s wisdom is highly valuable.

However, the modified version in the image translates to:
„Listening to you speak is just like... listening to you speak." (or something like that)
meaning that the speakers‘ words were meaningless or provided no real value—essentially, a polite way of saying that the conversation was pointless or uninformative.

is this correct? If so then i dont understand how this guy could‘ve had problems with that, hes just lazy.

 

[JusrKora]

I „researched“ this idiom and found this out,

The Chinese phrase in the image is:
“听君一席话，如听一席话”

original idiom “听君一席话，胜读十年书”, which means "Listening to your words is better than reading ten years' worth of books", implying that someone’s wisdom is highly valuable.

However, the modified version in the image translates to:
„Listening to you speak is just like... listening to you speak." (or something like that)
meaning that the speakers‘ words were meaningless or provided no real value—essentially, a polite way of saying that the conversation was pointless or uninformative.

is this correct? If so then i dont understand how this guy could‘ve had problems with that, hes just lazy.

Yes, that's correct. I'm sure he probably thought that the translation chatgpt provided sounded weird and off and scraped it