I'm a Loser, Baby - Ch. 64 - A Doctor to Save the World

[twinklecake]

@Kamelpov Yeah, except it doesn't, you ignoramus. That's not how biology or even physics work. At most, it works for psychological purposes for a narrow scope of people who buy into that shit, like getting over substance dependencies- situations where thinking you're okay can actually make you okay. Otherwise, it's not even good for pain relief or muscle relaxation, let alone the extraction of toxins. It's been tested and retested time and time again and evidence points overwhelmingly to none of it being even remotely real.

Seriously, why are people so in love with believing in shit they're told with zero critical thinking or independent research?

 

[Kamelpov]

@twinklecake you starting insult like"ignoramus" instead of showing real argument show you self destroying yourself in the debate.
And about believing in shit "you know about religion and sect it's all around the world and work great ? " Now you got your answer.

 

[twinklecake]

@Kamelpov I showed you several real arguments and called you an ignoramus on the side, you illiterate fuck. I guess it's no surprise you suck at reading as much as you do at typing though. That's not even a legible sentence you provided as an """answer""" there.

 

[Kamelpov]

@twinklecake yea still swearing yea feel the hate. PS. you don't need perfect sentence when you are in comments. It's not a thesis.

 

[twinklecake]

@Kamelpov You're literally not even legible half the time. Did you think you deserved descriptors other than those about your lack of intellect?

 

[Kamelpov]

@twinklecake Only for narrowed people like you. You did see machine translation "if you can't even read/self correct it it's your own fault as you didn't learn the language."
Your hypocrisy is so obvious.

 

[twinklecake]

@Kamelpov Again, that's not English. It actually makes no sense. Your words are failing to bring meaning across to the person you're trying to communicate with. It's not a stylistic problem. You're not understanable, you un-self-aware fuck.

 

[Kamelpov]

Deal with it. + You are the only one complaining.

 

[Otakugami]

@twinklecake It's a combination of the Dunning-Kruger effect and the Backfire effect.

The less someone knows, the more likely they are to overestimate what they know, and when you prove them wrong, it backfires and they refuse to accept any proof, and instead they double down in whatever they have already accepted as true, no matter how blatantly false.