Karakai Jouzu no (Moto) Takagi-san - Ch. 98

[JaxunHero]

CHI MVP LOL

 

[AnacondaHL]

Hell hath no fury like a woman's pudding stolen

 

[cloud7jay]

ara ara~ ahaha

 

[Oeconomist]

So, when Japanese mangaka accidentally eat the pudding of someone else, does it just never fucking occur to them to go immediately to get a replacement?!? I'm asking, because this theme of tension over eating the pudding of someone else is a recurring theme across manga.

 

[Fui-nee]

that smug face, ahhh

 

[AzureDragonLord]

*smug*


Me: *smiles*

 

[Kohpi]

Chi you little demon! Bwahaha

 

[deoclasher88]

Super Duper Mad

ゴゴゴゴゴゴゴゴゴゴ

 

[Some_Karaki-fan]

@Oeconomist I dont know if you're trying to upset the mangaka, or stain this wholesome chapter. But right now, you are pissing me off. Take your comment with you and f*** off

 

[Oeconomist]

@Some_Karaki-fan—

Are you trying to pick-up from where you left off with personal attacks?

 

[Some_Karaki-fan]

@Oeconomist I don't know why you would write a comment like that in the first place but you're kinda ruining the mood for everybody, aaaaand yeah no, just saw your replies today, first was chapter 74.5 before this comment.

 

[Oeconomist]

@Some_Karaki-fan—

No, comments by many people across many manga ventilate about clichéd storytelling, and the normal responses are shrugs or remarks in agreement. You are the first person whom I've seen explode in anger over such truth. Plainly, you did not begin in a good mood, and just needed an excuse to be hateful.

 

[Some_Karaki-fan]

@Oeconomist No? Don't remember asking a yes or no question. Bruh, did you even read your own comment, what truth? Your comment isn't even reasonable and you just sound like a brat. So of course I'll sound like one in exchange. And the truth that you were supposedly talking about is what the majority is talking about but your comment isn't even close to what they're talking about (meaning your complain was way different from other's complaint). Reread your comment and analyze why I got "angry" over it.

 

[Oeconomist]

@Some_Karaki-fan—

I wasn't answering a yes-or-no question; I was denying a flat falsehood on your part (and then I explained why it was false).

You should actually attend to my original comment, and face the fact that scores of manga use the very same plot device, whereas in the real world, there's a simple fix: “Oops! I ate Makoto's pudding! I'll leave a note, and then run to the store to replace it!”

And, again, lots of comments on MangaDex and elsewhere object to clichés such as that. Few if any other people have responded as you did.

What sort of brat gets furious when someone objects to cliché? And what sort of person cannot fully admit to responding inappropriately, but has to use quotation marks to suggest that he didn't really react as he did?

 

[Some_Karaki-fan]

@Oeconomist Not only do you need to reread your own comment, but you also need to reread this chapter. Because Nishikata thought that the pudding was an extra so of course he wouldn't think about running to a store to replace it, don't believe me? It commonly happens around the world. Well I would've thought that you sounded furious since it does sound like you're mad for something "cliché" like this manga. I mean you can't see how wholesome this manga is and you're sh*tting on it. At least other people say it in a more reasonable way.

 

[Oeconomist]

@Some_Karaki-fan—

He initially thought that the pudding was extra; when he learned otherwise, he didn't quickly effect the rather obvious solution available to these characters across all the manga im which this stupid plot device is used.

Since you think that racist tirades are reasonable, you'll need to offer more than a bald claim that my comment were unreasonable to be persuasive.