I mean, you can't actually say no to that kind of stuff, it's kinda like getting excommunicated.And yer dad's and the royals just went - sure bro.
Eh, wut?I mean, you can't actually say no to that kind of stuff, it's kinda like getting excommunicated.
If you decide to drop your family name, there's no much the family or the king can do. That's how it always worked. Disowning your family is no different from excommunicating someone, it's not really something you can go 'no' at.Eh, wut?
He didn't drop his family name. He gave up his position as the next margrave to be a knight and the royals and his dad accepted it.If you decide to drop your family name, there's no much the family or the king can do. That's how it always worked. Disowning your family is no different from excommunicating someone, it's not really something you can go 'no' at.
This translation is MTL and double checked with Jisho.org. Feel free to check the RAW chapters and correct me if I'm wrong.He didn't drop his family name. He gave up his position as the next margrave to be a knight and the royals and his dad accepted it.
1) He can be a knight and retire when his dad dies and pass the margrave title to him. No reason to relinquish it.
2) It's a margrave. A step below dukes and in actual influence and authority, they're no different from dukes. He's also the only male heir to the title. This is like a CEO liking a board director abilities and recruiting him as an office executive and they all go, 'cool, sure'. Like, bruh.
3) His family's line of succession is wrecked because of it.
4) Prince mentioned how important the margrave territory is and they just casually f*ed up the family.
Either the translation is wrong and they're not a margrave house, or the author just doesn't know anything about the aristocracy hierarchy. I'm leaning towards the latter. Afterall, author states her house is a frontier margrave... WTF is that even. Do you know how many barons and counts can fit within a margraves domain? Also why the margave married a commoner apothecary, then married mere knights to his daughter-now-next-margrave. And why is the next margrave working in a small apothecary?
Sorry, ranting. Issues keep popping out when I get into it. That's why, welp, shojo logic.
Yes, the translation seem right.Also, on page 10 she explains that because the border/frontier is attacked often, her parents just wanted her husband to be strong and a excellent swordsman. That's the only requirement...
Once again, there's literally 0 logic issue, nothing you mentioned is illogical or would allow the King or the family to refuse, it's his decision.He didn't drop his family name. He gave up his position as the next margrave to be a knight and the royals and his dad accepted it.
1) He can be a knight and retire when his dad dies and pass the margrave title to him. No reason to relinquish it.
2) It's a margrave. A step below dukes and in actual influence and authority, they're no different from dukes. He's also the only male heir to the title. This is like a CEO liking a board director abilities and recruiting him as an office executive and they all go, 'cool, sure'. Like, bruh.
3) His family's line of succession is wrecked because of it.
4) Prince mentioned how important the margrave territory is and they just casually f*ed up the family.
Either the translation is wrong and they're not a margrave house, or the author just doesn't know anything about the aristocracy hierarchy. I'm leaning towards the latter. Afterall, author states her house is a frontier margrave... WTF is that even. Do you know how many barons and counts can fit within a margraves domain? Also why the margave married a commoner apothecary, then married mere knights to his daughter-now-next-margrave. And why is the next margrave working in a small apothecary?
Sorry, ranting. Issues keep popping out when I get into it. That's why, welp, shojo logic.
He ignored nothing, those societies did let you drop whatever claims you had on whatever. There isn't a single society in history where you couldn't just refuse to be the heir.ignoring everything regarding the way such a society works
Sure, past or present. People can choose to quit or whatever, it's their choice. But the implications are huge, more so if it's in an older time. You have no idea how older or medieval society work do you... hell, maybe even present day society at that.Once again, there's literally 0 logic issue, nothing you mentioned is illogical or would allow the King or the family to refuse, it's his decision.
Your CEO exemple is even more silly, a board member can quit at any time and go working for whoever the fuck they want, it's his choice and even the fucking president can't do anything about it.
He ignored nothing, those societies did let you drop whatever claims you had on whatever. There isn't a single society in history where you couldn't just refuse to be the heir.
I mean, it's a knight order so he's pretty much still hired directly by the King as part of the standing army. From the King's perspective, he gained a great warrior while someone else from the family can administer the territory and worst case scenario, he's a free hostage.My CEO example is to highlight how nonsensical it is for someone of such high position is hiring another of an equally high position for a low level position
You're right, but the kingdom will be shooting themselves in the foot too. There's no bad blood between the margrave family and the royals. So, obtaining him will be a small insurance against rebellion at best, but in exchange the margrave territory, their important defensive position, is severely weakened. This hostage situation also hinges on them caring for their blood relative - remember, to join the knights, bro had to relinquish his claim. So even if royals threatens them with bro, if we're talking typical nobility, it'll be 'so what?', he's already not the successor anyway.I mean, it's a knight order so he's pretty much still hired directly by the King as part of the standing army. From the King's perspective, he gained a great warrior while someone else from the family can administer the territory and worst case scenario, he's a free hostage.
I dont know if i am right or not but knight of royal family is usually get a baron title so he cant get two titleWait wut. Yer bro chose to have a mere knight title over a freaking Margrave? And yer dad's and the royals just went - sure bro. And yer first husband who married into your family even dared to ask you to raise his half-commoner bastard as the next heir to yer Margrave house?
Welp, shojo logic.