So MangaDex is big on respecting scanlator's "rights" and acquiescing to their every request and doing things like implementing "delays". MangaDex also won't rehost stuff that is done by Mangasteam and whatnot. However, MangaDex has no problem allowing actual licensed works on the site provided they are "out of print".
Guess what? I am pretty sure that even if the company is defunct, even if the official translation is out of print licensed translations are still covered by copyright laws. You can read about it here: https://bookwormtranslations.com/copyright-law-and-translation-what-you-need-to-know/ or in any number of places. Works do no become part of the public domain just because the company went out of business. Stuff like ROMs and abandonware are still actually subject to copyright it is just that nobody cares. In the case of something being "out of print"—just because the owner of the copyright isn't making it for sale it doesn't you're free to do whatever you want.
MD is being completely hypocritical. It doesn't respect the rights of people who can actually make a legal claim to their work just because they aren't currently monetizing it—but it will bend over backwards to make sure that scanlators and other sites (like JB and Mangastream) can monetize the works that they have absolutely no legal claim to whatsoever.
If MD is going to extend protections to entities that have no legal claim to their content, then it seems pretty silly to violate the protections afforded to actual license holders. The whole thing is completely ideologically inconsistent. If MD doesn't want to be a "pirate" site that uses content without the creators' permission (even though there is nothing stopping it from doing so where scanlations are concerned), then all the content labelled "Ex-licenses" needs to go. Somewhere there is someone with a legitimate claim to that. It isn't public domain. The holders of those rights just haven't made trouble for MD yet and made a claim to them.
MD either needs respect everyone's "rights"—in this case both legal and completely imaginary (in the case of scanlators)—or it needs to chuck the whole farce and just be a "pirate" site. A compromise between the two positions is total hypocrisy and untenable.
I can't actually dictate how MD wants to conduct itself. I choose to the site and I am the one who pays my pittance of monthly donation. However, MD has provided this forum and this space specifically to make suggestions—so that is what I am doing.
TL;DR: I don't think the moderators have any business enforcing a third-party's imaginary claims when MD has no problem violating someone's actual legal rights to content. "Out of print" works are still subject to copyright. Scanlators have not be given the rights to do the translation—with the exception of TheElusiveTaco (who has actually be given the blessing of the creators although I do not know what sort of agreement TheElusiveTaco has with them—presumably the authors would be angered if TheElusiveTaco were to start selling their work without them proper remuneration). It is totally unreasonable from an ideological standpoint (I guess technically MD can do whatever it wants, but I don't agree with it—nor do I have to support it) for the admins to just arbitrarily enforce people's claims to content without any basis.
EDIT: Feel free to lock or delete this thread. I don't actually care anymore.
Guess what? I am pretty sure that even if the company is defunct, even if the official translation is out of print licensed translations are still covered by copyright laws. You can read about it here: https://bookwormtranslations.com/copyright-law-and-translation-what-you-need-to-know/ or in any number of places. Works do no become part of the public domain just because the company went out of business. Stuff like ROMs and abandonware are still actually subject to copyright it is just that nobody cares. In the case of something being "out of print"—just because the owner of the copyright isn't making it for sale it doesn't you're free to do whatever you want.
MD is being completely hypocritical. It doesn't respect the rights of people who can actually make a legal claim to their work just because they aren't currently monetizing it—but it will bend over backwards to make sure that scanlators and other sites (like JB and Mangastream) can monetize the works that they have absolutely no legal claim to whatsoever.
If MD is going to extend protections to entities that have no legal claim to their content, then it seems pretty silly to violate the protections afforded to actual license holders. The whole thing is completely ideologically inconsistent. If MD doesn't want to be a "pirate" site that uses content without the creators' permission (even though there is nothing stopping it from doing so where scanlations are concerned), then all the content labelled "Ex-licenses" needs to go. Somewhere there is someone with a legitimate claim to that. It isn't public domain. The holders of those rights just haven't made trouble for MD yet and made a claim to them.
MD either needs respect everyone's "rights"—in this case both legal and completely imaginary (in the case of scanlators)—or it needs to chuck the whole farce and just be a "pirate" site. A compromise between the two positions is total hypocrisy and untenable.
I can't actually dictate how MD wants to conduct itself. I choose to the site and I am the one who pays my pittance of monthly donation. However, MD has provided this forum and this space specifically to make suggestions—so that is what I am doing.
TL;DR: I don't think the moderators have any business enforcing a third-party's imaginary claims when MD has no problem violating someone's actual legal rights to content. "Out of print" works are still subject to copyright. Scanlators have not be given the rights to do the translation—with the exception of TheElusiveTaco (who has actually be given the blessing of the creators although I do not know what sort of agreement TheElusiveTaco has with them—presumably the authors would be angered if TheElusiveTaco were to start selling their work without them proper remuneration). It is totally unreasonable from an ideological standpoint (I guess technically MD can do whatever it wants, but I don't agree with it—nor do I have to support it) for the admins to just arbitrarily enforce people's claims to content without any basis.
EDIT: Feel free to lock or delete this thread. I don't actually care anymore.